Fraser Long

Found 4 people in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Utah and other states

Sponsored by SpokeoPaid Service

Fraser E Long

***** Bartlett Farm Rd, Nantucket, MA

View full report

Fraser Long

PO Box *****, Nantucket, MA

View full report

Fraser J Long

L*****@yahoo.com — (812) 639-****

***** N 1590 W, Pleasant Grove, UT

View full report

Fraser M Long

(508) 228-****

***** Bartlett Farm Rd, Nantucket, MA

View full report

Sponsored by SpokeoPaid Service

fraser****@gmail.com

Search secret profiles for fraser****@gmail.com

Search

fraser****@yahoo.com

Search secret profiles for fraser****@yahoo.com

Search

monkey****@y7mail.com

Search secret profiles for monkey****@y7mail.com

Search

Fraser Long

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Search for contact info, city & state history, relatives, jobs, education & more

Search public records
Fraser Long - @fraserlong9807 - Youtube

Fraser Long - @fraserlong9807

fraser long - @fraserlong6267 - Youtube

fraser long - @fraserlong6267

16 subscribers

Fraser Long - @fraserlong - Youtube

Fraser Long - @fraserlong

2 subscribers

Fraser Long - @fraserjlong - Youtube

Fraser Long - @fraserjlong

The Kate Fraser Group at Long & Foster Real Estate - @TheKateFraserGroup - Youtube

The Kate Fraser Group at Long & Foster Real Estate - @TheKateFraserGroup

Catriona "Kate" Fraser decided to pursue her interests in business and real estate and began her new career as a Realtor in 2012 ...

Fraser Long - LinkedIn

Fraser Long

Nantucket, MA
Fraser Long - LinkedIn

Fraser Long

Event Manager - Bray Leino Events

Fraser Long - LinkedIn

Fraser Long

Tennis Coach - Tennis World Australia

Fraser Long - LinkedIn

Fraser Long

Administration Support Officer - SA Health

Fraser Long - LinkedIn

Fraser Long

London, England, United Kingdom

Education: Central Foundation Boys School

Fraser Long - LinkedIn

Fraser Long

United Kingdom
Fraser Long - LinkedIn

Fraser Long

Plymouth, England, United Kingdom
Fraser Long - LinkedIn

Fraser Long

Oxford
Kristen Fraser-Long - LinkedIn

Kristen Fraser-Long

Minneapolis, MN

THE ALLIANCE OF THERAPY DOGS

Fraser Long - LinkedIn

Fraser Long

Australia
Melissa Fraser Long - LinkedIn

Melissa Fraser Long

Raeford

Bookkeeper - Sandy Grove Middle School

Fraser Long - LinkedIn

Fraser Long

Adelaide

Education: St Michael's College

Steve Fraser - LinkedIn

Steve Fraser

Long Wittenham, England, United Kingdom
Dan Fraser - LinkedIn

Dan Fraser

Long Term Care Specialist - DCNC Retirement Planning

Fredricka Fraser - LinkedIn

Fredricka Fraser

Long Term Substitute Teacher
Experience: CHARLES COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Craig Fraser - LinkedIn

Craig Fraser

Reading

Long Haul Pilot - Virgin Atlantic

Jillian Gramling, PT, DPT, MS - LinkedIn

Jillian Gramling, PT, DPT, MS

Minneapolis, MN

Pediatric Physical Therapist

David Fraser - LinkedIn

David Fraser

Long Island University - Greenlawn, New York ...
Experience: Self-employed
Education: Long Island ...

Melanie Oncley Fraser - LinkedIn

Melanie Oncley Fraser

Long Beach, CA

Kinetic Content
Education: California State University-Long Beach

Jada Fraser - LinkedIn

Jada Fraser

Long Beach, NY

Education: Kingsborough Community College

Alexander Fraser - LinkedIn

Alexander Fraser

Long Beach, California, United States ...
Mya Fraser - LinkedIn

Mya Fraser

Long Haul Cabin Crew - Air New Zealand

Carol Fraser - LinkedIn

Carol Fraser

Barrington 

Long Beach City College - Barrington Hills, Illinois ...
Experience: Northwest Community Hospital
Education: Long Beach City College

Abby Ellis - LinkedIn

Abby Ellis

Partner Services Manager - WEX Benefits

Show all results...

Evan (Fraser) Long

  • Memorial High School (1993 - 1997)

    Houston, TX

Wendi (Fraser) Long

  • Apple Valley High School (1991 - 1995)

    Apple Valley, MN

Melissa (Fraser) Long

  • Baker County High School (1980 - 1984)

    Baker, FL

Rhona (Fraser) Long

  • John Rennie High School (1971 - 1975)

    Pointe Claire, QC

Jean (Fraser) Long

  • Southeastern High School (1947 - 1951)

    Detroit, MI

Fraser Long

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Search for Fraser Long's city and state history

Search address history

Websites owned by Fraser Long

oxfordkarateacademy.com

Registered on February 13, 2004

Jean Long Obituary (2024) Ann Arbor, MI Ann Arbor News

Grand Rapids Press Obituaries - Fri, 24 May 2024

Australian tennis legend Neale Fraser dies at 91

NewsBytes - Tue, 03 Dec 2024

Obituaries in Visalia, CA | Tulare County

Visalia Times-Delta and Tulare Advance-Register - Thu, 01 Aug 2024

The Mummy Director Comments On Fourth Movie Possibilities Following Brendan Fraser Career Resurgence

Screen Rant - Sun, 12 May 2024

Who owns House of Fraser? The long and complicated history behind major chain

The Northern Echo - Mon, 30 Sep 2024

Cocteau Twins’ Elizabeth Fraser Announces Record Store Day EP, Her First New Release In 13 Years

Stereogum - Mon, 21 Feb 2022

Gen Z icon Sadie Sink had never seen a Brendan Fraser movie before being cast in The Whale

The A.V. Club - Thu, 01 Dec 2022

What to Know About the Controversy Surrounding The Whale

TIME - Fri, 09 Dec 2022

The curious case of Wabooson Lodge

Sky-Hi News - Wed, 22 Aug 2012

Citi, Falling Behind Peers, Unveils ‘Uncomfortable’ Changes and Layoffs (Published 2023)

The New York Times - Wed, 13 Sep 2023

Brendan Fraser on the "destructive" impact of 'The Mummy'

Far Out Magazine - Wed, 07 Sep 2022

Chef John Fraser Leans Into His Mediterranean Background With Latest Midtown Restaurant Iris

Eater NY - Tue, 20 Apr 2021

Book excerpt: Legendary Montreal investor Scott Fraser keeps his cool amid pandemic

Montreal Gazette - Fri, 20 Nov 2020

Macey Fraser's long journey from mascot to Wellington Phoenix goal-scorer

Stuff - Tue, 31 Oct 2023

Music Network presents Alasdair Fraser, Natalie Haas and Mairéad Ní Mhaonaigh: The Iona Connection

The Journal of Music - Thu, 06 Feb 2014

Long COVID cases set to grow as more people fall through the cracks of support

ABC News - Mon, 18 Jul 2022

In Memoriam: Bob Fraser

Beach Metro News - Wed, 26 Apr 2017

Oxfordshire academy chain criticised over safety fears

BBC - Fri, 12 Jan 2018

Alasdair Fraser, Natalie Haas & Mairéad Ní Mhaonaigh-The Iona Connection

The Journal of Music - Wed, 23 Apr 2014

Fraser’s ‘Long Gone’ album re-released on vinyl

Shetland Times Online - Tue, 06 Mar 2018

Frustrated but not giving up –Mario Deane’s defiant mom is still fighting for justice

Jamaica Gleaner - Sun, 04 Aug 2019

Principal and vice principal suddenly leave struggling Oxford school

Oxford Mail - Mon, 08 Jan 2018

Trust merger could help ‘inadequate’ school

Oxford Mail - Mon, 16 Nov 2020

Hamleys owner to take control of House of Fraser and shut stores

Daily Gazette - Wed, 02 May 2018

House of Fraser staff have to wait until June to find out which stores will close

Wales Online - Wed, 02 May 2018

Fears House of Fraser could shut up shop in Belfast

The Irish News - Thu, 03 May 2018

Here's What We Know About Fraser's Mysterious LDR In 'We Are Who We Are'

Elite Daily - Mon, 14 Sep 2020

What We Know About Brendan Fraser's 3 Sons

The List - Tue, 21 Mar 2023

Tragic Details About Brendan Fraser

Nicki Swift - Wed, 11 May 2022

Show all results...
Fraser Long - @fraserlong7 - Pinterest

Fraser Long - @fraserlong7

17 followers

Fraser Long - @fraserlong1417 - Pinterest

Fraser Long - @fraserlong1417

12 followers

Fraser Long - @fraserlong677 - Pinterest

Fraser Long - @fraserlong677

13 followers

Fraser Long - @fraserlong - Pinterest

Fraser Long - @fraserlong

0 followers

"What is legitimate expectation? Obviously, it is not a legal right. It is an expectation of a benefit, relief or remedy that may ordinarily flow from a promise or established practice. The term 'established practice' refers to a regular, consistent predictable and certain conduct, process or activity of the decision-making authority. The expectation should be legitimate, that is, reasonable, logical and valid. Any expectation which is based on sporadic or casual or random acts, or which is unreasonable, illogical or invalid cannot be a legitimate expectation. Not being a right, it is not enforceable as such. It is a concept fashioned by courts, for judicial review of administrative action. It is procedural in character based on the requirement of a higher degree of fairness in administrative action, as a consequence of the promise made, or practice established." [2006 (8) SCJ 721] In order to maintain the balance between the continuously evolving freedom of individuals and state authority, the Administrative law has to also evolve itself to suit the needs and expectations of people and their rights and duties. There are several principles of Administrative Law, which have been evolved by the courts for the purpose of controlling the exercise of power so that it does not lead to arbitrariness or abuse of power. These principles are intended to provide safeguard to the citizens against abuse or misuse of power by the instrumentalities or agencies of the State. One of the latest and important of these principles is the 'doctrine of legitimate expectation', which is an outcome of synthesis between the principle of administrative fairness (a component of the principles of natural justice) and the rule of estoppel1. Legitimate Expectations, are different from Expectations at large, and are not Legal rights, but are expectation of benefits, relief/remedy that accrues from a promise or established practices, and give rise to locus standi to a person to seek judicial review of any action, of State or its subsidiaries, which are arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair, malicious in law, devoid of Rule of law and violative of the principles of Natural Justice2. Origin The evolvement of the doctrine of Legitimate Expectation in the Common law jurisdiction can been traced to an obiter dictum of Lord Denning M. R in Sehmidt v. Secretary of Home Affairs3. Lord Denning observed in Sehmidt: "The speeches in Ridge v Baldwin show that an administrative body may, in a proper case, be bound to give a person who is affected by their decision an opportunity of making representations. It all depends on whether he has some right or interest or I would add, some legitimate expectation, of which it would not be fair to deprive him without hearing what he has to say ...." In this case certain non national students at Hubbard College of Scientology had been given leave to enter the United Kingdom before July, 1968, initially for a period of a month. The periods had been extended to the end of August and September 1968, respectively. Applications were made on behalf of the plaintiffs to the Home Office on June 11 and July 15, 1968 for extensions of their stay until November and December 1968, to complete their studies. By letters of July 29 and 30 the Home Secretary, the defendant, rejected the applications. The plaintiff's stay was, however, extended to September 30 to let them make arrangements to leave. The Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and 50 other alien students of the college, claimed declarations against the defendant that his decision not to consider further similar applications for extension of stay was unlawful, void, and of no effect and the defendant was bound to consider such applications on their merit and in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The court of appeal held that they had no legitimate expectation of extension and therefore no right to hearing, though revocation of their permits within the earlier granted period of permit would have been contrary to legitimate expectation. The legitimate expectation referred to in, this case did not give the alien students an enforceable right to stay for the time originally permitted but an enforceable right to be heard before the decision to revoke his permit was taken: a procedural protection only4. Evolution in India As already stated that the Doctrine of "Legitimate Expectation " is not a legal right in itself embedded in some statute of Code readily available for its inference and applicability. However it is a right to be treated fairly and the same has been fashioned by judicial precedents of various courts over a period time and is still in its evolving stage. The Supreme Court in M/S Sethi Auto Service Station vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors5. has examined the concept of 'legitimate expectation'. While dealing with the question of allotment of a plot by the DDA, the Supreme Court has enumerated various decisions of the concept of Legitimate Expectation and examined the law relating thereto. The Court held as under; "19. The protection of legitimate expectations, as pointed out in De Smith's Judicial Review (Sixth Edition) (para 12-001), is at the root of the constitutional principle of the rule of law, which requires regularity, predictability, and certainty in government's dealings with the public. The doctrine of legitimate expectation and its impact in the administrative law has been considered by this Court in a catena of decisions but for the sake of brevity we do not propose to refer to all these cases. Nevertheless, in order to appreciate the concept, we shall refer to a few decisions. At this juncture, we deem it necessary to refer to a decision by the House of Lords in Council of Civil Service Unions & Ors. Vs. Minister for the Civil Service, a locus classicus on the subject, wherein for the first time an attempt was made to give a comprehensive definition to the principle of legitimate expectation. Enunciating the basic principles relating to legitimate expectation, Lord Diplock observed that for a legitimate expectation to arise, the decision of the administrative authority must affect such person either (a) by altering rights or obligations of that person which are enforceable by or against him in private law or; (b) by depriving him of some benefit or advantage which either: (i) he has in the past been permitted by the decision maker to enjoy and which he can legitimately expect to be permitted to continue to do until some rational ground for withdrawing it has been communicated to him and he has been given an opportunity to comment thereon or (ii) he has received assurance from the decisionmaker that they will not be withdrawn without first giving him an opportunity of advancing reasons for contending that they should be withdrawn. 20. In Attorney General of Hong Kong Vs. Ng Yuen Shiu, a leading case on the subject, Lord Fraser said: "when a public authority has promised to follow a certain procedure, it is in the interest of good administration that it should act fairly and should implement its promise, so long as the implementation does not interfere with in its statutory duty". 21. Explaining the nature and scope of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in Food Corporation of India Vs. M/s Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, a three-Judge Bench of this Court had observed thus: "The mere reasonable or legitimate expectation of a citizen, in such a situation, may not by itself be a distinct enforceable right, but failure to consider and give due weight to it may render the decision arbitrary, and this is how the requirement of due consideration of a legitimate expectation forms part of the principle of non-arbitrariness, a necessary concomitant of the rule of law. Every legitimate expectation is a relevant factor requiring due consideration in a fair decision-making process. Whether the expectation of the claimant is reasonable or legitimate in the context is a question of fact in each case. Whenever the question arises, it is to be determined not according to the claimant's perception but in larger public interest wherein other more important considerations may outweigh what would otherwise have been the legitimate expectation of the claimant. A bona fide decision of the public authority reached in this manner would satisfy the requirement of nonarbitrariness and withstand judicial scrutiny. The doctrine of legitimate expectation gets assimilated in the rule of law and operates in our legal system in this manner and to this extent." 22. The concept of legitimate expectation again came up for consideration in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Hindustan Development Corporation & Ors. Referring to a large number of foreign and Indian decisions, including in Council of Civil Service Unions and Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries (supra) and elaborately explaining the concept of legitimate expectation, it was observed as under: "If a denial of legitimate expectation in a given case amounts to denial of right guaranteed or is arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair or biased, gross abuse of power or violation of principles of natural justice, the same can be questioned on the well-known grounds attracting Article 14 but a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It can be one of the grounds to consider but the court must lift the veil and see whether the decision is violative of these principles warranting interference. It depends very much on the facts and the recognized general principles of administrative law applicable to such facts and the concept of legitimate expectation which is the latest recruit to a long list of concepts fashioned by the courts for the review of administrative action, must be restricted to the general legal limitations applicable and binding the manner of the future exercise of administrative power in a particular case. It follows that the concept of legitimate expectation is "not the key which unlocks the treasury of natural justice and it ought not unlock the gate which shuts the court out of review on the merits", particularly when the element of speculation and uncertainty is inherent in that very concept." 23. Taking note of the observations of the Australian High Court in Attorney General for New South Wales Vs. Quinn that, "to strike down the exercise of administrative power solely on the ground of avoiding the disappointment of the legitimate expectations of an individual would be to set the Courts adrift on a featureless sea of pragmatism", speaking for the Bench, K. Jayachandra Reddy, J. said that there are stronger reasons as to why the legitimate expectation should not be substantively protected than the reasons as to why it should be protected. The caution sounded in the said Australian case that the Courts should restrain themselves and restrict such claims duly to the legal limitations was also endorsed. 24. Then again in National Buildings Construction Corporation Vs. S. Raghunathan & Ors., a three-Judge Bench of this Court observed as under: "The doctrine of "legitimate expectation" has its genesis in the field of administrative law. The Government and its departments, in administering the affairs of the country, are expected to honour their statements of policy or intention and treat the citizens with full personal consideration without any iota of abuse of discretion. The policy statements cannot be disregarded unfairly or applied selectively. Unfairness in the form of unreasonableness is akin to violation of natural justice. It was in this context that the doctrine of "legitimate expectation" was evolved which today has become a source of substantive as well as procedural rights. But claims based on "legitimate expectation" have been held to require reliance on representations and resulting detriment to the claimant in the same way as claims based on promissory estoppel." 25. This Court in Punjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors., referring to a large number of authorities on the question, observed that a change in policy can defeat a substantive legitimate expectation if it can be justified on "Wednesbury" reasonableness. The decision maker has the choice in the balancing of the pros and cons relevant to the change in policy. Therefore, the choice of the policy is for the decision maker and not for the Court. The legitimate substantive expectation, merely permits the Court to find out if the change in policy which is the cause for defeating the legitimate expectation is irrational or perverse or one which no reasonable person could have made. (Also see: Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer & Ors. 26. Very recently in Jitendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. It has been reiterated that a legitimate expectation is not the same thing as anticipation. It is distinct and different from a desire and hope. It is based on a right. It is grounded in the rule of law as requiring regularity, predictability and certainty in the Government's dealings with the public and the doctrine of legitimate expectation operates both in procedural and substantive matters. An examination of the afore-noted few decisions shows that the golden thread running through all these decisions is that a case for applicability of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, now accepted in the subjective sense as part of our legal jurisprudence, arises when an administrative body by reason of a representation or by past practice or conduct aroused an expectation which it would be within its powers to fulfill unless some overriding public interest comes in the way. However, a person who bases his claim on the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in the first instance, has to satisfy that he has relied on the said representation and the denial of that expectation has worked to his detriment. The Court could interfere only if the decision taken by the authority was found to be arbitrary, unreasonable or in gross abuse of power or in violation of principles of natural justice and not taken in public interest. But a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It is well settled that the concept of legitimate expectation has no role to play where the State action is as a public policy or in the public interest unless the action taken amounts to an abuse of power. The court must not usurp the discretion of the public authority which is empowered to take the decisions under law and the court is expected to apply an objective standard which leaves to the deciding authority the full range of choice which the legislature is presumed to have intended. Even in a case where the decision is left entirely to the discretion of the deciding authority without any such legal bounds and if the decision is taken fairly and objectively, the court will not interfere on the ground of procedural fairness to a person whose interest based on legitimate expectation might be affected. Therefore, a legitimate expectation can at the most be one of the grounds which may give rise to judicial review but the granting of relief is very much limited. - @whatislegitimateexpectationobv - Pinterest

"What is legitimate expectation? Obviously, it is not a legal right. It is an expectation of a benefit, relief or remedy that may ordinarily flow from a promise or established practice. The term 'established practice' refers to a regular, consistent predictable and certain conduct, process or activity of the decision-making authority. The expectation should be legitimate, that is, reasonable, logical and valid. Any expectation which is based on sporadic or casual or random acts, or which is unreasonable, illogical or invalid cannot be a legitimate expectation. Not being a right, it is not enforceable as such. It is a concept fashioned by courts, for judicial review of administrative action. It is procedural in character based on the requirement of a higher degree of fairness in administrative action, as a consequence of the promise made, or practice established." [2006 (8) SCJ 721] In order to maintain the balance between the continuously evolving freedom of individuals and state authority, the Administrative law has to also evolve itself to suit the needs and expectations of people and their rights and duties. There are several principles of Administrative Law, which have been evolved by the courts for the purpose of controlling the exercise of power so that it does not lead to arbitrariness or abuse of power. These principles are intended to provide safeguard to the citizens against abuse or misuse of power by the instrumentalities or agencies of the State. One of the latest and important of these principles is the 'doctrine of legitimate expectation', which is an outcome of synthesis between the principle of administrative fairness (a component of the principles of natural justice) and the rule of estoppel1. Legitimate Expectations, are different from Expectations at large, and are not Legal rights, but are expectation of benefits, relief/remedy that accrues from a promise or established practices, and give rise to locus standi to a person to seek judicial review of any action, of State or its subsidiaries, which are arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair, malicious in law, devoid of Rule of law and violative of the principles of Natural Justice2. Origin The evolvement of the doctrine of Legitimate Expectation in the Common law jurisdiction can been traced to an obiter dictum of Lord Denning M. R in Sehmidt v. Secretary of Home Affairs3. Lord Denning observed in Sehmidt: "The speeches in Ridge v Baldwin show that an administrative body may, in a proper case, be bound to give a person who is affected by their decision an opportunity of making representations. It all depends on whether he has some right or interest or I would add, some legitimate expectation, of which it would not be fair to deprive him without hearing what he has to say ...." In this case certain non national students at Hubbard College of Scientology had been given leave to enter the United Kingdom before July, 1968, initially for a period of a month. The periods had been extended to the end of August and September 1968, respectively. Applications were made on behalf of the plaintiffs to the Home Office on June 11 and July 15, 1968 for extensions of their stay until November and December 1968, to complete their studies. By letters of July 29 and 30 the Home Secretary, the defendant, rejected the applications. The plaintiff's stay was, however, extended to September 30 to let them make arrangements to leave. The Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and 50 other alien students of the college, claimed declarations against the defendant that his decision not to consider further similar applications for extension of stay was unlawful, void, and of no effect and the defendant was bound to consider such applications on their merit and in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The court of appeal held that they had no legitimate expectation of extension and therefore no right to hearing, though revocation of their permits within the earlier granted period of permit would have been contrary to legitimate expectation. The legitimate expectation referred to in, this case did not give the alien students an enforceable right to stay for the time originally permitted but an enforceable right to be heard before the decision to revoke his permit was taken: a procedural protection only4. Evolution in India As already stated that the Doctrine of "Legitimate Expectation " is not a legal right in itself embedded in some statute of Code readily available for its inference and applicability. However it is a right to be treated fairly and the same has been fashioned by judicial precedents of various courts over a period time and is still in its evolving stage. The Supreme Court in M/S Sethi Auto Service Station vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors5. has examined the concept of 'legitimate expectation'. While dealing with the question of allotment of a plot by the DDA, the Supreme Court has enumerated various decisions of the concept of Legitimate Expectation and examined the law relating thereto. The Court held as under; "19. The protection of legitimate expectations, as pointed out in De Smith's Judicial Review (Sixth Edition) (para 12-001), is at the root of the constitutional principle of the rule of law, which requires regularity, predictability, and certainty in government's dealings with the public. The doctrine of legitimate expectation and its impact in the administrative law has been considered by this Court in a catena of decisions but for the sake of brevity we do not propose to refer to all these cases. Nevertheless, in order to appreciate the concept, we shall refer to a few decisions. At this juncture, we deem it necessary to refer to a decision by the House of Lords in Council of Civil Service Unions & Ors. Vs. Minister for the Civil Service, a locus classicus on the subject, wherein for the first time an attempt was made to give a comprehensive definition to the principle of legitimate expectation. Enunciating the basic principles relating to legitimate expectation, Lord Diplock observed that for a legitimate expectation to arise, the decision of the administrative authority must affect such person either (a) by altering rights or obligations of that person which are enforceable by or against him in private law or; (b) by depriving him of some benefit or advantage which either: (i) he has in the past been permitted by the decision maker to enjoy and which he can legitimately expect to be permitted to continue to do until some rational ground for withdrawing it has been communicated to him and he has been given an opportunity to comment thereon or (ii) he has received assurance from the decisionmaker that they will not be withdrawn without first giving him an opportunity of advancing reasons for contending that they should be withdrawn. 20. In Attorney General of Hong Kong Vs. Ng Yuen Shiu, a leading case on the subject, Lord Fraser said: "when a public authority has promised to follow a certain procedure, it is in the interest of good administration that it should act fairly and should implement its promise, so long as the implementation does not interfere with in its statutory duty". 21. Explaining the nature and scope of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in Food Corporation of India Vs. M/s Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, a three-Judge Bench of this Court had observed thus: "The mere reasonable or legitimate expectation of a citizen, in such a situation, may not by itself be a distinct enforceable right, but failure to consider and give due weight to it may render the decision arbitrary, and this is how the requirement of due consideration of a legitimate expectation forms part of the principle of non-arbitrariness, a necessary concomitant of the rule of law. Every legitimate expectation is a relevant factor requiring due consideration in a fair decision-making process. Whether the expectation of the claimant is reasonable or legitimate in the context is a question of fact in each case. Whenever the question arises, it is to be determined not according to the claimant's perception but in larger public interest wherein other more important considerations may outweigh what would otherwise have been the legitimate expectation of the claimant. A bona fide decision of the public authority reached in this manner would satisfy the requirement of nonarbitrariness and withstand judicial scrutiny. The doctrine of legitimate expectation gets assimilated in the rule of law and operates in our legal system in this manner and to this extent." 22. The concept of legitimate expectation again came up for consideration in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Hindustan Development Corporation & Ors. Referring to a large number of foreign and Indian decisions, including in Council of Civil Service Unions and Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries (supra) and elaborately explaining the concept of legitimate expectation, it was observed as under: "If a denial of legitimate expectation in a given case amounts to denial of right guaranteed or is arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair or biased, gross abuse of power or violation of principles of natural justice, the same can be questioned on the well-known grounds attracting Article 14 but a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It can be one of the grounds to consider but the court must lift the veil and see whether the decision is violative of these principles warranting interference. It depends very much on the facts and the recognized general principles of administrative law applicable to such facts and the concept of legitimate expectation which is the latest recruit to a long list of concepts fashioned by the courts for the review of administrative action, must be restricted to the general legal limitations applicable and binding the manner of the future exercise of administrative power in a particular case. It follows that the concept of legitimate expectation is "not the key which unlocks the treasury of natural justice and it ought not unlock the gate which shuts the court out of review on the merits", particularly when the element of speculation and uncertainty is inherent in that very concept." 23. Taking note of the observations of the Australian High Court in Attorney General for New South Wales Vs. Quinn that, "to strike down the exercise of administrative power solely on the ground of avoiding the disappointment of the legitimate expectations of an individual would be to set the Courts adrift on a featureless sea of pragmatism", speaking for the Bench, K. Jayachandra Reddy, J. said that there are stronger reasons as to why the legitimate expectation should not be substantively protected than the reasons as to why it should be protected. The caution sounded in the said Australian case that the Courts should restrain themselves and restrict such claims duly to the legal limitations was also endorsed. 24. Then again in National Buildings Construction Corporation Vs. S. Raghunathan & Ors., a three-Judge Bench of this Court observed as under: "The doctrine of "legitimate expectation" has its genesis in the field of administrative law. The Government and its departments, in administering the affairs of the country, are expected to honour their statements of policy or intention and treat the citizens with full personal consideration without any iota of abuse of discretion. The policy statements cannot be disregarded unfairly or applied selectively. Unfairness in the form of unreasonableness is akin to violation of natural justice. It was in this context that the doctrine of "legitimate expectation" was evolved which today has become a source of substantive as well as procedural rights. But claims based on "legitimate expectation" have been held to require reliance on representations and resulting detriment to the claimant in the same way as claims based on promissory estoppel." 25. This Court in Punjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors., referring to a large number of authorities on the question, observed that a change in policy can defeat a substantive legitimate expectation if it can be justified on "Wednesbury" reasonableness. The decision maker has the choice in the balancing of the pros and cons relevant to the change in policy. Therefore, the choice of the policy is for the decision maker and not for the Court. The legitimate substantive expectation, merely permits the Court to find out if the change in policy which is the cause for defeating the legitimate expectation is irrational or perverse or one which no reasonable person could have made. (Also see: Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer & Ors. 26. Very recently in Jitendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. It has been reiterated that a legitimate expectation is not the same thing as anticipation. It is distinct and different from a desire and hope. It is based on a right. It is grounded in the rule of law as requiring regularity, predictability and certainty in the Government's dealings with the public and the doctrine of legitimate expectation operates both in procedural and substantive matters. An examination of the afore-noted few decisions shows that the golden thread running through all these decisions is that a case for applicability of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, now accepted in the subjective sense as part of our legal jurisprudence, arises when an administrative body by reason of a representation or by past practice or conduct aroused an expectation which it would be within its powers to fulfill unless some overriding public interest comes in the way. However, a person who bases his claim on the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in the first instance, has to satisfy that he has relied on the said representation and the denial of that expectation has worked to his detriment. The Court could interfere only if the decision taken by the authority was found to be arbitrary, unreasonable or in gross abuse of power or in violation of principles of natural justice and not taken in public interest. But a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It is well settled that the concept of legitimate expectation has no role to play where the State action is as a public policy or in the public interest unless the action taken amounts to an abuse of power. The court must not usurp the discretion of the public authority which is empowered to take the decisions under law and the court is expected to apply an objective standard which leaves to the deciding authority the full range of choice which the legislature is presumed to have intended. Even in a case where the decision is left entirely to the discretion of the deciding authority without any such legal bounds and if the decision is taken fairly and objectively, the court will not interfere on the ground of procedural fairness to a person whose interest based on legitimate expectation might be affected. Therefore, a legitimate expectation can at the most be one of the grounds which may give rise to judicial review but the granting of relief is very much limited. - @whatislegitimateexpectationobv

2,034 followers

Fraser Long - @dwarfman96 - Pinterest

Fraser Long - @dwarfman96

0 followers

Fraser Long - @longlifetiling - Pinterest

Fraser Long - @longlifetiling

2 followers

Fraser Long - @fraserlong8 - Pinterest

Fraser Long - @fraserlong8

1 follower

Fraser Long - @frazzel11 - Pinterest

Fraser Long - @frazzel11

1 follower

Fraserlong - @fraserlong7542 - Pinterest

Fraserlong - @fraserlong7542

0 followers

Show all results...

Ladlyslipper Wellness | About — LADYSLIPPER WELLNESS

Hi, I’m Fraser Long. I am a certified Fertility Awareness Educator and Holistic Reproductive Health Practitioner. I earned my certification at Justisse College in 2023. My fertility awareness …

Long COVID therapies ready to start at Western | CTV News

Long COVID can have wide-ranging impacts, but is most commonly associated with brain fog, breathing difficulties and debilitating fatigue. "Long COVID has really mystified a …

Anyone have experience with Fraser Engine Co? : …

JEGS and Summit Racing have short, long and complete engines for the 5.3. Thinking about Fraser or Jasper for my 5.4v 3V in my 2008 expedition with 265k on original. Does anybody …

25 long-term care homes. Which provide the best care?

When it comes to long-term care facilities in the Fraser Valley, some tend to their residents better than others. They spend more time with residents, provide more physical …

Buy Engines and Transmissions In The USA | Fraser Engines Co

Browse Our Extensive Inventory Today. Explore our selection and let Fraser Engines help get you where you need to be. Experience the Fraser difference – quality, speed, and reliability that …

Search people online

Related searches:
Greta Long
Greta Long
Ian Lang
Ian Lang
Melissa Long
Melissa Long
Steve Fraser
Steve Fraser
Show more...

People Search:

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Continue
We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. More info