June Field

Found 29 people in Nevada, New York, California and other states

June Field - @field_junea - Twitter

June Field - @field_junea

Huntington Beach

Opportunities don’t wait. Neither should your trades. Stay Tez. 📈
Need help? DM @kotaksecsupport

June Field - @Eventi83_tp - Twitter

June Field - @Eventi83_tp

Pegognaga

Living a life of integrity and honesty. Staying true to my values and beliefs in all that I do with intention.

June Field - @June20453405 - Twitter

June Field - @June20453405

Tucson, AZ

twitter.com

Retired sales manager

Valeri June Field - @ValeriJuneField - Twitter

Valeri June Field - @ValeriJuneField

London

Main:Total beer specialist ...

June Field - @junefield0202 - Twitter

June Field - @junefield0202

Scotland

junefieldmedium.com

June Field-Quoted by Media as Worlds Greatest Psychic. Winner of International Battle of the #Psychics. Psychic TV Detective. Celebrity Psychic.

June Field - @JuneFie41296632 - Twitter

June Field - @JuneFie41296632

Revenge is sweet

June Field - @JuneFie98135303 - Twitter

June Field - @JuneFie98135303

To live a creative life, we must lose our fear of being wrong. ~Anonymous

June Field - @JuneFie09262383 - Twitter

June Field - @JuneFie09262383

There is no place like home

June Field - @JuneFie92771586 - Twitter

June Field - @JuneFie92771586

For a classicist, a competitive athlete is painful to look at; trying hard to become an animal rather than a man, he will never be as fast as a cheetah or as st

June Field - @theUKtravelista - Twitter

June Field - @theUKtravelista

busy

June Field Medium - @MediumJuneField - Twitter

June Field Medium - @MediumJuneField

junefieldmedium.com

Quoted by the media as "World's Greatest Psychic" Winner of International Battle of Psychics & Former Psychic Columnist at @sunday_post

June Field - @JuneFie80605816 - Twitter

June Field - @JuneFie80605816

B

June field - @Junefield6 - Twitter

June field - @Junefield6

June Field - @June_Field - Twitter

June Field - @June_Field

June Field - @junefieldmedium - Twitter

June Field - @junefieldmedium

june field - @FieldJune - Twitter

june field - @FieldJune

june field - @junefield5 - Twitter

june field - @junefield5

June Field - @insanoid1p - Twitter

June Field - @insanoid1p

June Field - @JuneFie40467089 - Twitter

June Field - @JuneFie40467089

June Field - @field_june50896 - Twitter

June Field - @field_june50896

June Field - @JuneField3 - Twitter

June Field - @JuneField3

Ava June Field - @FieldAva - Twitter

Ava June Field - @FieldAva

June_field - @fieldofjune - Twitter

June_field - @fieldofjune

Show all results...

Sponsored by SpokeoPaid Service

June E Field

B*****@yahoo.com — (815) 899-****

***** John St, Sycamore, IL

View full report

June J Field

(650) 349-****

***** Sanderling St, Foster City, CA

View full report

June T Field

F*****@gmail.com — (607) 478-****

PO Box *****, Andover, NY

View full report

June M Field

L*****@verizon.net — (909) 591-****

***** Ahmann Ave, Whittier, CA

View full report

June Field

J*****@yahoo.com — (702) 401-****

***** W Agate Ave, Las Vegas, NV

View full report

June A Field

J*****@yahoo.com — (610) 481-****

***** S Krocks Rd, Trlr 46, Allentown, PA

June D Field

J*****@gmail.com — (520) 578-****

***** S Full Moon Dr, Tucson, AZ

June R Field

(801) 295-****

***** Medical Dr, Bountiful, UT

Show all results...

Sponsored by SpokeoPaid Service

junef****@gmail.com

Search secret profiles for junef****@gmail.com

Search

junef****@yahoo.com

Search secret profiles for junef****@yahoo.com

Search

June Field

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Search for contact info, city & state history, relatives, jobs, education & more

Search public records
junefield
junefields
junefieldmedium
june.field
fieldjune
mediumjunefield
junefield_
junefield51
junefields22
junefield0202
junefield3
junefields16
john_eightsix
junefield26
junefield44
field_trips_co_uk
june.field.3
winthropbaby52
junefield66
junefield20
june333field
junefield21
junefield67
junefield.360
field2758
junefieldpsychicmedium
nannyjunefield
junefield11
june.field123
junee_field
junedave26
lepage.june
ellie_june_field
june_field_
junellebromfield
lilyjunefield
junefieldtrading
junefields1978
field_junea
eventi83_tp
june20453405
valerijunefield
junefie41296632
junefie98135303
junefie09262383
junefie92771586
theuktravelista
junefie80605816
junefield6
june_field
junefield5
insanoid1p
junefie40467089
field_june50896
fieldava
fieldofjune
june.field.140
june.field.583
june.field.737
june.field2
june.field0
june_field5
junefield4
junefields50
junefield599
junefield0733
junefields26
june_field02
junefields44
junefields27
june_field2
june_springfield
junefields5
junefields39
june.fields3
junefields382
junefields155
june.fields
junefields2
junefields84
june.fields7
june.fieldhouse
junefield1910
jfieldmedium
junefield2506
junefield388
fieldhickory
fieldjune8
junebloke
junefield6385
field0524
whatislegitimateexpectationobv
travellista
field3186
jaybird6156
field0140
junefield42
junefielduk
field0348
juneandherb
junefield52
jscottfield
field1505
fieldjune45
junetalk
field7856
junerfields
fieldsjune651
junefields0132
ellajunefields
junefields2511
junekfields
junefields873
ejunefields
ellajunefields5073
junefields21
june7fields
junefielder
junefields77
junefields346
Show all results...
June Field - LinkedIn

June Field

Global PR Comms Consultant THREE SIXTY DEGREES

June Field - LinkedIn

June Field

Manager, Marketing, HMO
June Field - LinkedIn

June Field

Collections Account Manager at BPCE Equipment ...

June Field - LinkedIn

June Field

--

June field - LinkedIn

June field

London

PR Consultant at Three Sixty Degrees

June Field - LinkedIn

June Field

Key Accounts Manager at Fedgroup Financial Services

June Field - LinkedIn

June Field

Clarksdale, MS

Machine Operator at Golden Peanut and Tree Nuts ...

June Field - LinkedIn

June Field

Adelaide

Independent Avon Representative at Avon

June Field - LinkedIn

June Field

West Midlands

Retired at Blacks camping +leisure

Show all results...

June Field

  • Parkland High School (1966 - 1970)

    Orefield, PA

June (Field) Trueblood

  • Ballinger High School (1961 - 1965)

    Ballinger, TX

June (Field) Ward

  • Wachusett Regional High School (1958 - 1962)

    Holden, MA

June (Ruffin) Field

  • Southern Regional High School (1958 - 1958)

    Manahawkin, NJ

June Field

  • East Providence High School (1953 - 1957)

    East Providence, RI

June Field

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Search for June Field's city and state history

Search address history

Campaign contribution records

June Field

Tucson, AZ

Retired

WINRED (2025, 2024, 2023)

June Field

S Full Moon Dr., AZ

Retired

JOHN JAMES FOR CONGRESS, INC. (2024)

Marilyn June Field

Lincoln, CA

Retired

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE (2023)

June Ellen Field - Obituary

June Ellen Field

Escalon, CA

Died: January 30, 2022 (aged 89)
Born: June 1, 1932

June Elaine Field - Obituary

June Elaine Field

Phoenix, AZ

Died: January 25, 2018 (aged 95)
Born: May 30, 1922

June Reeves Field Randall - Obituary

June Reeves Field Randall

Centerville, UT

Died: May 15, 2016 (aged 96)
Born: June 23, 1919

Websites owned by June Field

threesixtydegrees.net

Registered on August 2, 2005

County Announces Retirement of Homeless Services Director Weeks After Disclosing Deficit

wweek.com - Tue, 25 Mar 2025

Pakistan army chief Munir back in US to meet senior political and military leadership

Asia News Network - Mon, 11 Aug 2025

I’m the Royal Family's psychic I know many secrets from hours of readings...& it's got me into trouble

The Sun - Sat, 01 Nov 2025

Scots psychic claims Royal Family are among clients and she knows their secrets

Daily Record - Tue, 04 Nov 2025

‘There have been a few surreal moments’: Meet the celebrity psychic who helped catch a serial killer

belfasttelegraph.co.uk - Sat, 27 Sep 2025

An Evening of Psychic Mediumship with International Psychic Medium June Field

list.co.uk - Tue, 29 Apr 2025

Field Marshal Asim Munir meets US defence officials

The Express Tribune - Sun, 10 Aug 2025

'They have always done stuff together' Twins celebrate 100th birthday

bucksfreepress.co.uk - Tue, 20 May 2025

Oldest surviving twins in Britain turn 100

walesonline.co.uk - Fri, 23 May 2025

An Evening of Psychic Mediumship With Worlds Greatest Psychic June Field

list.co.uk - Sat, 17 May 2025

June 2022 Field Research Tasks & Rewards

Pokémon GO Hub - Thu, 02 Jun 2022

Meet world-class medium June Field who leaves A-listers including Hugh Grant starstruck

pressandjournal.co.uk - Mon, 15 May 2023

Wayne Thompson 01/18/2011 Bakken Young Funeral Home River Falls and New Richmond Wisconsin

bakken-young.com - Wed, 19 Jan 2011

'Spirits were always by my side' – world-famous medium June Field shares her story ahead of Inverness event

inverness-courier.co.uk - Wed, 07 Feb 2024

World’s best psychic returns to Fraserburgh

scotsman.com - Fri, 21 Apr 2023

See Every New Shade In Olive & June’s Summer Camp Collection

Refinery29 - Thu, 12 May 2022

The Daily — Principal field crop areas, June 2022

Statistique Canada - Tue, 05 Jul 2022

Public School 256 Students Celebrate June Field Day

rockawave.com - Fri, 08 Jun 2007

From Psychic to the Stars to Rising Stars on Netflix: 10 Famous Psychic Mediums to Watch in 2025

AOL.com - Thu, 02 Jan 2025

Grand Bahama Birding Group June Field Trip‏ By Erika Gates Jun 26, 2013 9:46:48 AM

thebahamasweekly.com - Wed, 26 Jun 2013

June Field Trip of the Grand Bahama Birding Group Report By Erika Gates Jul 4, 2013 11:23:19 AM

thebahamasweekly.com - Thu, 04 Jul 2013

Psychic to Royal Family saw spirits at end of her bed

devonlive.com - Sat, 30 Oct 2021

Scots psychic 'busier than ever' helping A-list celebs during Covid lockdown

Daily Record - Thu, 11 Jun 2020

B.C.'s tiniest public school slated to close

CBC - Thu, 18 Feb 2016

Linda Lusardi's hubby thanks Scots psychic for helping wife through Covid-19 battle

The Scottish Sun - Sat, 25 Apr 2020

World-renowned psychic who has worked with Hollywood stars coming to Greenock

greenocktelegraph.co.uk - Thu, 20 Jul 2023

Top medium coming to Moray

northern-scot.co.uk - Mon, 10 Feb 2020

The midlife women using psychics to help them say goodbye

Daily Mail - Mon, 08 Feb 2021

Identical twins to celebrate 100th birthday this month

southwalesargus.co.uk - Fri, 16 May 2025

Show all results...
June Field - @June Field - Flickr

June Field - @June Field

0 photos - 1 follower

june field - @fieldhickory - Flickr

june field - @fieldhickory

0 photos - 0 followers

june field - @fieldjune8 - Pinterest

june field - @fieldjune8

0 followers

June Field - @junebloke - Pinterest

June Field - @junebloke

0 followers

JUNE FIELD - @JUNEFIELD6385 - Pinterest

JUNE FIELD - @JUNEFIELD6385

3 followers

June Field - @field0524 - Pinterest

June Field - @field0524

0 followers

"What is legitimate expectation? Obviously, it is not a legal right. It is an expectation of a benefit, relief or remedy that may ordinarily flow from a promise or established practice. The term 'established practice' refers to a regular, consistent predictable and certain conduct, process or activity of the decision-making authority. The expectation should be legitimate, that is, reasonable, logical and valid. Any expectation which is based on sporadic or casual or random acts, or which is unreasonable, illogical or invalid cannot be a legitimate expectation. Not being a right, it is not enforceable as such. It is a concept fashioned by courts, for judicial review of administrative action. It is procedural in character based on the requirement of a higher degree of fairness in administrative action, as a consequence of the promise made, or practice established." [2006 (8) SCJ 721] In order to maintain the balance between the continuously evolving freedom of individuals and state authority, the Administrative law has to also evolve itself to suit the needs and expectations of people and their rights and duties. There are several principles of Administrative Law, which have been evolved by the courts for the purpose of controlling the exercise of power so that it does not lead to arbitrariness or abuse of power. These principles are intended to provide safeguard to the citizens against abuse or misuse of power by the instrumentalities or agencies of the State. One of the latest and important of these principles is the 'doctrine of legitimate expectation', which is an outcome of synthesis between the principle of administrative fairness (a component of the principles of natural justice) and the rule of estoppel1. Legitimate Expectations, are different from Expectations at large, and are not Legal rights, but are expectation of benefits, relief/remedy that accrues from a promise or established practices, and give rise to locus standi to a person to seek judicial review of any action, of State or its subsidiaries, which are arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair, malicious in law, devoid of Rule of law and violative of the principles of Natural Justice2. Origin The evolvement of the doctrine of Legitimate Expectation in the Common law jurisdiction can been traced to an obiter dictum of Lord Denning M. R in Sehmidt v. Secretary of Home Affairs3. Lord Denning observed in Sehmidt: "The speeches in Ridge v Baldwin show that an administrative body may, in a proper case, be bound to give a person who is affected by their decision an opportunity of making representations. It all depends on whether he has some right or interest or I would add, some legitimate expectation, of which it would not be fair to deprive him without hearing what he has to say ...." In this case certain non national students at Hubbard College of Scientology had been given leave to enter the United Kingdom before July, 1968, initially for a period of a month. The periods had been extended to the end of August and September 1968, respectively. Applications were made on behalf of the plaintiffs to the Home Office on June 11 and July 15, 1968 for extensions of their stay until November and December 1968, to complete their studies. By letters of July 29 and 30 the Home Secretary, the defendant, rejected the applications. The plaintiff's stay was, however, extended to September 30 to let them make arrangements to leave. The Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and 50 other alien students of the college, claimed declarations against the defendant that his decision not to consider further similar applications for extension of stay was unlawful, void, and of no effect and the defendant was bound to consider such applications on their merit and in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The court of appeal held that they had no legitimate expectation of extension and therefore no right to hearing, though revocation of their permits within the earlier granted period of permit would have been contrary to legitimate expectation. The legitimate expectation referred to in, this case did not give the alien students an enforceable right to stay for the time originally permitted but an enforceable right to be heard before the decision to revoke his permit was taken: a procedural protection only4. Evolution in India As already stated that the Doctrine of "Legitimate Expectation " is not a legal right in itself embedded in some statute of Code readily available for its inference and applicability. However it is a right to be treated fairly and the same has been fashioned by judicial precedents of various courts over a period time and is still in its evolving stage. The Supreme Court in M/S Sethi Auto Service Station vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors5. has examined the concept of 'legitimate expectation'. While dealing with the question of allotment of a plot by the DDA, the Supreme Court has enumerated various decisions of the concept of Legitimate Expectation and examined the law relating thereto. The Court held as under; "19. The protection of legitimate expectations, as pointed out in De Smith's Judicial Review (Sixth Edition) (para 12-001), is at the root of the constitutional principle of the rule of law, which requires regularity, predictability, and certainty in government's dealings with the public. The doctrine of legitimate expectation and its impact in the administrative law has been considered by this Court in a catena of decisions but for the sake of brevity we do not propose to refer to all these cases. Nevertheless, in order to appreciate the concept, we shall refer to a few decisions. At this juncture, we deem it necessary to refer to a decision by the House of Lords in Council of Civil Service Unions & Ors. Vs. Minister for the Civil Service, a locus classicus on the subject, wherein for the first time an attempt was made to give a comprehensive definition to the principle of legitimate expectation. Enunciating the basic principles relating to legitimate expectation, Lord Diplock observed that for a legitimate expectation to arise, the decision of the administrative authority must affect such person either (a) by altering rights or obligations of that person which are enforceable by or against him in private law or; (b) by depriving him of some benefit or advantage which either: (i) he has in the past been permitted by the decision maker to enjoy and which he can legitimately expect to be permitted to continue to do until some rational ground for withdrawing it has been communicated to him and he has been given an opportunity to comment thereon or (ii) he has received assurance from the decisionmaker that they will not be withdrawn without first giving him an opportunity of advancing reasons for contending that they should be withdrawn. 20. In Attorney General of Hong Kong Vs. Ng Yuen Shiu, a leading case on the subject, Lord Fraser said: "when a public authority has promised to follow a certain procedure, it is in the interest of good administration that it should act fairly and should implement its promise, so long as the implementation does not interfere with in its statutory duty". 21. Explaining the nature and scope of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in Food Corporation of India Vs. M/s Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, a three-Judge Bench of this Court had observed thus: "The mere reasonable or legitimate expectation of a citizen, in such a situation, may not by itself be a distinct enforceable right, but failure to consider and give due weight to it may render the decision arbitrary, and this is how the requirement of due consideration of a legitimate expectation forms part of the principle of non-arbitrariness, a necessary concomitant of the rule of law. Every legitimate expectation is a relevant factor requiring due consideration in a fair decision-making process. Whether the expectation of the claimant is reasonable or legitimate in the context is a question of fact in each case. Whenever the question arises, it is to be determined not according to the claimant's perception but in larger public interest wherein other more important considerations may outweigh what would otherwise have been the legitimate expectation of the claimant. A bona fide decision of the public authority reached in this manner would satisfy the requirement of nonarbitrariness and withstand judicial scrutiny. The doctrine of legitimate expectation gets assimilated in the rule of law and operates in our legal system in this manner and to this extent." 22. The concept of legitimate expectation again came up for consideration in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Hindustan Development Corporation & Ors. Referring to a large number of foreign and Indian decisions, including in Council of Civil Service Unions and Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries (supra) and elaborately explaining the concept of legitimate expectation, it was observed as under: "If a denial of legitimate expectation in a given case amounts to denial of right guaranteed or is arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair or biased, gross abuse of power or violation of principles of natural justice, the same can be questioned on the well-known grounds attracting Article 14 but a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It can be one of the grounds to consider but the court must lift the veil and see whether the decision is violative of these principles warranting interference. It depends very much on the facts and the recognized general principles of administrative law applicable to such facts and the concept of legitimate expectation which is the latest recruit to a long list of concepts fashioned by the courts for the review of administrative action, must be restricted to the general legal limitations applicable and binding the manner of the future exercise of administrative power in a particular case. It follows that the concept of legitimate expectation is "not the key which unlocks the treasury of natural justice and it ought not unlock the gate which shuts the court out of review on the merits", particularly when the element of speculation and uncertainty is inherent in that very concept." 23. Taking note of the observations of the Australian High Court in Attorney General for New South Wales Vs. Quinn that, "to strike down the exercise of administrative power solely on the ground of avoiding the disappointment of the legitimate expectations of an individual would be to set the Courts adrift on a featureless sea of pragmatism", speaking for the Bench, K. Jayachandra Reddy, J. said that there are stronger reasons as to why the legitimate expectation should not be substantively protected than the reasons as to why it should be protected. The caution sounded in the said Australian case that the Courts should restrain themselves and restrict such claims duly to the legal limitations was also endorsed. 24. Then again in National Buildings Construction Corporation Vs. S. Raghunathan & Ors., a three-Judge Bench of this Court observed as under: "The doctrine of "legitimate expectation" has its genesis in the field of administrative law. The Government and its departments, in administering the affairs of the country, are expected to honour their statements of policy or intention and treat the citizens with full personal consideration without any iota of abuse of discretion. The policy statements cannot be disregarded unfairly or applied selectively. Unfairness in the form of unreasonableness is akin to violation of natural justice. It was in this context that the doctrine of "legitimate expectation" was evolved which today has become a source of substantive as well as procedural rights. But claims based on "legitimate expectation" have been held to require reliance on representations and resulting detriment to the claimant in the same way as claims based on promissory estoppel." 25. This Court in Punjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors., referring to a large number of authorities on the question, observed that a change in policy can defeat a substantive legitimate expectation if it can be justified on "Wednesbury" reasonableness. The decision maker has the choice in the balancing of the pros and cons relevant to the change in policy. Therefore, the choice of the policy is for the decision maker and not for the Court. The legitimate substantive expectation, merely permits the Court to find out if the change in policy which is the cause for defeating the legitimate expectation is irrational or perverse or one which no reasonable person could have made. (Also see: Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer & Ors. 26. Very recently in Jitendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. It has been reiterated that a legitimate expectation is not the same thing as anticipation. It is distinct and different from a desire and hope. It is based on a right. It is grounded in the rule of law as requiring regularity, predictability and certainty in the Government's dealings with the public and the doctrine of legitimate expectation operates both in procedural and substantive matters. An examination of the afore-noted few decisions shows that the golden thread running through all these decisions is that a case for applicability of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, now accepted in the subjective sense as part of our legal jurisprudence, arises when an administrative body by reason of a representation or by past practice or conduct aroused an expectation which it would be within its powers to fulfill unless some overriding public interest comes in the way. However, a person who bases his claim on the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in the first instance, has to satisfy that he has relied on the said representation and the denial of that expectation has worked to his detriment. The Court could interfere only if the decision taken by the authority was found to be arbitrary, unreasonable or in gross abuse of power or in violation of principles of natural justice and not taken in public interest. But a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It is well settled that the concept of legitimate expectation has no role to play where the State action is as a public policy or in the public interest unless the action taken amounts to an abuse of power. The court must not usurp the discretion of the public authority which is empowered to take the decisions under law and the court is expected to apply an objective standard which leaves to the deciding authority the full range of choice which the legislature is presumed to have intended. Even in a case where the decision is left entirely to the discretion of the deciding authority without any such legal bounds and if the decision is taken fairly and objectively, the court will not interfere on the ground of procedural fairness to a person whose interest based on legitimate expectation might be affected. Therefore, a legitimate expectation can at the most be one of the grounds which may give rise to judicial review but the granting of relief is very much limited. - @whatislegitimateexpectationobv - Pinterest

"What is legitimate expectation? Obviously, it is not a legal right. It is an expectation of a benefit, relief or remedy that may ordinarily flow from a promise or established practice. The term 'established practice' refers to a regular, consistent predictable and certain conduct, process or activity of the decision-making authority. The expectation should be legitimate, that is, reasonable, logical and valid. Any expectation which is based on sporadic or casual or random acts, or which is unreasonable, illogical or invalid cannot be a legitimate expectation. Not being a right, it is not enforceable as such. It is a concept fashioned by courts, for judicial review of administrative action. It is procedural in character based on the requirement of a higher degree of fairness in administrative action, as a consequence of the promise made, or practice established." [2006 (8) SCJ 721] In order to maintain the balance between the continuously evolving freedom of individuals and state authority, the Administrative law has to also evolve itself to suit the needs and expectations of people and their rights and duties. There are several principles of Administrative Law, which have been evolved by the courts for the purpose of controlling the exercise of power so that it does not lead to arbitrariness or abuse of power. These principles are intended to provide safeguard to the citizens against abuse or misuse of power by the instrumentalities or agencies of the State. One of the latest and important of these principles is the 'doctrine of legitimate expectation', which is an outcome of synthesis between the principle of administrative fairness (a component of the principles of natural justice) and the rule of estoppel1. Legitimate Expectations, are different from Expectations at large, and are not Legal rights, but are expectation of benefits, relief/remedy that accrues from a promise or established practices, and give rise to locus standi to a person to seek judicial review of any action, of State or its subsidiaries, which are arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair, malicious in law, devoid of Rule of law and violative of the principles of Natural Justice2. Origin The evolvement of the doctrine of Legitimate Expectation in the Common law jurisdiction can been traced to an obiter dictum of Lord Denning M. R in Sehmidt v. Secretary of Home Affairs3. Lord Denning observed in Sehmidt: "The speeches in Ridge v Baldwin show that an administrative body may, in a proper case, be bound to give a person who is affected by their decision an opportunity of making representations. It all depends on whether he has some right or interest or I would add, some legitimate expectation, of which it would not be fair to deprive him without hearing what he has to say ...." In this case certain non national students at Hubbard College of Scientology had been given leave to enter the United Kingdom before July, 1968, initially for a period of a month. The periods had been extended to the end of August and September 1968, respectively. Applications were made on behalf of the plaintiffs to the Home Office on June 11 and July 15, 1968 for extensions of their stay until November and December 1968, to complete their studies. By letters of July 29 and 30 the Home Secretary, the defendant, rejected the applications. The plaintiff's stay was, however, extended to September 30 to let them make arrangements to leave. The Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and 50 other alien students of the college, claimed declarations against the defendant that his decision not to consider further similar applications for extension of stay was unlawful, void, and of no effect and the defendant was bound to consider such applications on their merit and in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The court of appeal held that they had no legitimate expectation of extension and therefore no right to hearing, though revocation of their permits within the earlier granted period of permit would have been contrary to legitimate expectation. The legitimate expectation referred to in, this case did not give the alien students an enforceable right to stay for the time originally permitted but an enforceable right to be heard before the decision to revoke his permit was taken: a procedural protection only4. Evolution in India As already stated that the Doctrine of "Legitimate Expectation " is not a legal right in itself embedded in some statute of Code readily available for its inference and applicability. However it is a right to be treated fairly and the same has been fashioned by judicial precedents of various courts over a period time and is still in its evolving stage. The Supreme Court in M/S Sethi Auto Service Station vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors5. has examined the concept of 'legitimate expectation'. While dealing with the question of allotment of a plot by the DDA, the Supreme Court has enumerated various decisions of the concept of Legitimate Expectation and examined the law relating thereto. The Court held as under; "19. The protection of legitimate expectations, as pointed out in De Smith's Judicial Review (Sixth Edition) (para 12-001), is at the root of the constitutional principle of the rule of law, which requires regularity, predictability, and certainty in government's dealings with the public. The doctrine of legitimate expectation and its impact in the administrative law has been considered by this Court in a catena of decisions but for the sake of brevity we do not propose to refer to all these cases. Nevertheless, in order to appreciate the concept, we shall refer to a few decisions. At this juncture, we deem it necessary to refer to a decision by the House of Lords in Council of Civil Service Unions & Ors. Vs. Minister for the Civil Service, a locus classicus on the subject, wherein for the first time an attempt was made to give a comprehensive definition to the principle of legitimate expectation. Enunciating the basic principles relating to legitimate expectation, Lord Diplock observed that for a legitimate expectation to arise, the decision of the administrative authority must affect such person either (a) by altering rights or obligations of that person which are enforceable by or against him in private law or; (b) by depriving him of some benefit or advantage which either: (i) he has in the past been permitted by the decision maker to enjoy and which he can legitimately expect to be permitted to continue to do until some rational ground for withdrawing it has been communicated to him and he has been given an opportunity to comment thereon or (ii) he has received assurance from the decisionmaker that they will not be withdrawn without first giving him an opportunity of advancing reasons for contending that they should be withdrawn. 20. In Attorney General of Hong Kong Vs. Ng Yuen Shiu, a leading case on the subject, Lord Fraser said: "when a public authority has promised to follow a certain procedure, it is in the interest of good administration that it should act fairly and should implement its promise, so long as the implementation does not interfere with in its statutory duty". 21. Explaining the nature and scope of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in Food Corporation of India Vs. M/s Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, a three-Judge Bench of this Court had observed thus: "The mere reasonable or legitimate expectation of a citizen, in such a situation, may not by itself be a distinct enforceable right, but failure to consider and give due weight to it may render the decision arbitrary, and this is how the requirement of due consideration of a legitimate expectation forms part of the principle of non-arbitrariness, a necessary concomitant of the rule of law. Every legitimate expectation is a relevant factor requiring due consideration in a fair decision-making process. Whether the expectation of the claimant is reasonable or legitimate in the context is a question of fact in each case. Whenever the question arises, it is to be determined not according to the claimant's perception but in larger public interest wherein other more important considerations may outweigh what would otherwise have been the legitimate expectation of the claimant. A bona fide decision of the public authority reached in this manner would satisfy the requirement of nonarbitrariness and withstand judicial scrutiny. The doctrine of legitimate expectation gets assimilated in the rule of law and operates in our legal system in this manner and to this extent." 22. The concept of legitimate expectation again came up for consideration in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Hindustan Development Corporation & Ors. Referring to a large number of foreign and Indian decisions, including in Council of Civil Service Unions and Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries (supra) and elaborately explaining the concept of legitimate expectation, it was observed as under: "If a denial of legitimate expectation in a given case amounts to denial of right guaranteed or is arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair or biased, gross abuse of power or violation of principles of natural justice, the same can be questioned on the well-known grounds attracting Article 14 but a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It can be one of the grounds to consider but the court must lift the veil and see whether the decision is violative of these principles warranting interference. It depends very much on the facts and the recognized general principles of administrative law applicable to such facts and the concept of legitimate expectation which is the latest recruit to a long list of concepts fashioned by the courts for the review of administrative action, must be restricted to the general legal limitations applicable and binding the manner of the future exercise of administrative power in a particular case. It follows that the concept of legitimate expectation is "not the key which unlocks the treasury of natural justice and it ought not unlock the gate which shuts the court out of review on the merits", particularly when the element of speculation and uncertainty is inherent in that very concept." 23. Taking note of the observations of the Australian High Court in Attorney General for New South Wales Vs. Quinn that, "to strike down the exercise of administrative power solely on the ground of avoiding the disappointment of the legitimate expectations of an individual would be to set the Courts adrift on a featureless sea of pragmatism", speaking for the Bench, K. Jayachandra Reddy, J. said that there are stronger reasons as to why the legitimate expectation should not be substantively protected than the reasons as to why it should be protected. The caution sounded in the said Australian case that the Courts should restrain themselves and restrict such claims duly to the legal limitations was also endorsed. 24. Then again in National Buildings Construction Corporation Vs. S. Raghunathan & Ors., a three-Judge Bench of this Court observed as under: "The doctrine of "legitimate expectation" has its genesis in the field of administrative law. The Government and its departments, in administering the affairs of the country, are expected to honour their statements of policy or intention and treat the citizens with full personal consideration without any iota of abuse of discretion. The policy statements cannot be disregarded unfairly or applied selectively. Unfairness in the form of unreasonableness is akin to violation of natural justice. It was in this context that the doctrine of "legitimate expectation" was evolved which today has become a source of substantive as well as procedural rights. But claims based on "legitimate expectation" have been held to require reliance on representations and resulting detriment to the claimant in the same way as claims based on promissory estoppel." 25. This Court in Punjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors., referring to a large number of authorities on the question, observed that a change in policy can defeat a substantive legitimate expectation if it can be justified on "Wednesbury" reasonableness. The decision maker has the choice in the balancing of the pros and cons relevant to the change in policy. Therefore, the choice of the policy is for the decision maker and not for the Court. The legitimate substantive expectation, merely permits the Court to find out if the change in policy which is the cause for defeating the legitimate expectation is irrational or perverse or one which no reasonable person could have made. (Also see: Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer & Ors. 26. Very recently in Jitendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. It has been reiterated that a legitimate expectation is not the same thing as anticipation. It is distinct and different from a desire and hope. It is based on a right. It is grounded in the rule of law as requiring regularity, predictability and certainty in the Government's dealings with the public and the doctrine of legitimate expectation operates both in procedural and substantive matters. An examination of the afore-noted few decisions shows that the golden thread running through all these decisions is that a case for applicability of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, now accepted in the subjective sense as part of our legal jurisprudence, arises when an administrative body by reason of a representation or by past practice or conduct aroused an expectation which it would be within its powers to fulfill unless some overriding public interest comes in the way. However, a person who bases his claim on the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in the first instance, has to satisfy that he has relied on the said representation and the denial of that expectation has worked to his detriment. The Court could interfere only if the decision taken by the authority was found to be arbitrary, unreasonable or in gross abuse of power or in violation of principles of natural justice and not taken in public interest. But a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It is well settled that the concept of legitimate expectation has no role to play where the State action is as a public policy or in the public interest unless the action taken amounts to an abuse of power. The court must not usurp the discretion of the public authority which is empowered to take the decisions under law and the court is expected to apply an objective standard which leaves to the deciding authority the full range of choice which the legislature is presumed to have intended. Even in a case where the decision is left entirely to the discretion of the deciding authority without any such legal bounds and if the decision is taken fairly and objectively, the court will not interfere on the ground of procedural fairness to a person whose interest based on legitimate expectation might be affected. Therefore, a legitimate expectation can at the most be one of the grounds which may give rise to judicial review but the granting of relief is very much limited. - @whatislegitimateexpectationobv

2,163 followers

June Field - @travellista - Pinterest

June Field - @travellista

0 followers

june field - @field3186 - Pinterest

june field - @field3186

0 followers

June Field - @jaybird6156 - Pinterest

June Field - @jaybird6156

0 followers

June Field - @field0140 - Pinterest

June Field - @field0140

0 followers

June Field - @junefield42 - Pinterest

June Field - @junefield42

0 followers

June Field - @junefielduk - Pinterest

June Field - @junefielduk

3 followers

June Field - @field0348 - Pinterest

June Field - @field0348

2 followers

June Field - @juneandherb - Pinterest

June Field - @juneandherb

2 followers

June Field - @junefield52 - Pinterest

June Field - @junefield52

0 followers

June Scott-field - @jscottfield - Pinterest

June Scott-field - @jscottfield

0 followers

June Field - @junefield0202 - Pinterest

June Field - @junefield0202

0 followers

June Field - @field1505 - Pinterest

June Field - @field1505

0 followers

June field - @fieldjune45 - Pinterest

June field - @fieldjune45

0 followers

June Field - @junetalk - Pinterest

June Field - @junetalk

0 followers

June Field - @field7856 - Pinterest

June Field - @field7856

0 followers

Hilary Fiorito - @junefield - Pinterest

Hilary Fiorito - @junefield

134 followers

June Fields - @junerfields - Pinterest

June Fields - @junerfields

17 followers

june fields - @fieldsjune651 - Pinterest

june fields - @fieldsjune651

0 followers

June Fields - @junefields0132 - Pinterest

June Fields - @junefields0132

0 followers

June Fields - @junefields16 - Pinterest

June Fields - @junefields16

35 followers

Ella-June Fields - @ellajunefields - Pinterest

Ella-June Fields - @ellajunefields

14 followers

june fields - @junefields2511 - Pinterest

june fields - @junefields2511

2 followers

June Fields - @junekfields - Pinterest

June Fields - @junekfields

5 followers

June Fields - @junefields - Pinterest

June Fields - @junefields

0 followers

June Fields - @junefields873 - Pinterest

June Fields - @junefields873

0 followers

Ella June.fields - @ejunefields - Pinterest

Ella June.fields - @ejunefields

0 followers

Ella June.fields - @ellajunefields5073 - Pinterest

Ella June.fields - @ellajunefields5073

0 followers

Show all results...
1962 St. Joseph's Academy Yearbook - Archives

1962 St. Joseph's Academy Yearbook

St. Joseph's Academy
1962

Wachusett Regional High School yearbook - Archives

Wachusett Regional High School yearbook

1962

Ancient and Honorable Artillery Yearbooks and Programs - Archives

Ancient and Honorable Artillery Yearbooks and Programs

2019 Shawnigan Lake - Archives

2019 Shawnigan Lake

Shawnigan Lake School
2019

DTIC ADA454550: Extended Range Underwater Loudhailer for Port Security Applications - Archives

DTIC ADA454550: Extended Range Underwater Loudhailer for Port Security Applications

Defense Technical Information Center
2006

dugway proving ground - Archives

dugway proving ground

The Desert Magazine 1953-08: Vol 16 Iss 8 - Archives

The Desert Magazine 1953-08: Vol 16 Iss 8

1953

Nova Scotia minerals update. Volume 21, no. 3 (summer 2004) - Archives

Nova Scotia minerals update. Volume 21, no. 3 (summer 2004)

2004

RF Newsletter 2018-03 - Archives

RF Newsletter 2018-03

Orange County Amateur Radio Club
2018

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) 19740023688: Iron-absorption band analysis for the discrimination of iron-rich zones. [spectroradiometric measurements of Goldfield, Nevada - Archives

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) 19740023688: Iron-absorption band analysis for the discrimination of iron-rich zones. [spectroradiometric measurements of Goldfield, Nevada

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
1974

BARS Newsletter 2025-02 - Archives

BARS Newsletter 2025-02

Billerica Amateur Radio Society
2025

General information bulletin, achievement testing program, grades 3, 6, and 9 - Archives

General information bulletin, achievement testing program, grades 3, 6, and 9

Alberta. Alberta Education,Alberta. Student Evaluation Branch,Alberta. Alberta Learning,Alberta. Learner Assessment Branch
2005

The Carrier 1985-06 - Archives

The Carrier 1985-06

Mount Diablo Amateur Radio Club
1985

Report of the Northeast area interim field conference / John W. Asher, Jr., director, Northeast Area Office ; Rural Electrification Administration - Archives

Report of the Northeast area interim field conference / John W. Asher, Jr., director, Northeast Area Office ; Rural Electrification Administration

Asher, John W., Jr., author
1953

RF Newsletter 2018-01 - Archives

RF Newsletter 2018-01

Orange County Amateur Radio Club
2018

The Carrier 1983-04 - Archives

The Carrier 1983-04

Mount Diablo Amateur Radio Club
1983

QRP-L Digest 1996-07-22 - Archives

QRP-L Digest 1996-07-22

1996

B-Plus 2024-01 - Archives

B-Plus 2024-01

Albany Amateur Radio Association
2024

W6TRW Crosstalk 1985-05 - Archives

W6TRW Crosstalk 1985-05

W6TRW Amateur Radio Club
1985

Bulletin - Archives

Bulletin

Virginia Native Plant Society
1988

Show all results...

June Field | Genuine International Psychic Medium | Psychic to the ...

Psychic Medium June Field was born in Dundee, Scotland with a rare ability to connect with Spirit. She works in a totally unique and engaging way.

JUNE FIELD – THE WORLD'S GREATEST PSYCHIC - GloTIMEtv

If you want a reading with June Field please click the link to her website. junefieldmedium.com · facebook.com/JuneFieldMedium/ · twitter.com/ ...

June Field - Ava Stuller

June Field ... A color study of the early summer fields of Camano Island. Signed on reverse. Comes framed. Add To Cart. Share ...

June Field - Wikipedia

June Field is a World Series of Poker champion in the 1982 $400 Ladies - Limit 7 Card Stud event. June Field. World Series of Poker · Bracelet(s), 1.

June Field: books, biography, latest update - Amazon.com

June Field, most popular Collecting Georgian and Victorian crafts Hardcover Books, Filters, Sort by: Popularity, 3 titles.

Approval for June Field Trips - Montgomery County Public Schools

Approval for June Field Trips. Office of School Support and Improvement. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Rockville, Maryland 20850. MCPS Form 210-6. September ...

June Field Research (Via LeekDuck) : r/TheSilphRoad - Reddit

June Field Research (Via LeekDuck) · Comments Section · Community Info Section · More posts you may like.

June Field International Psychic Medium - WeGotTickets

An Evening of Psychic Mediumship with Worlds Greatest Psychic June Field ; CAMPBLETOWN: The Town Hall · Friday 27th June, 2025 · Door time: 7:00pm, Start time: 7: ...

Calendar • SCWUA June Field Trip - Valley County Water District

SCWUA June Field Trip. Thursday, June 22, 2023. Date: June 22, 2023. 2023-06-22T11:30:00. Time: 11:30 AM - 12:15 PM. Location: Event Location. Address: Pomona, ...

Calendar.June Field (Java.Util) - Learn Microsoft

Calendar.June Field · Definition · Remarks · Applies to · Additional resources.

June Field & Alice Flynn - Mission Hospice & Home Care

June Field joined the Auxiliary in 1994 when she retired after many years of teaching kindergarten. “I didn't even know what hospice was when I joined – but my ...

June Field - Burchfield Penney Art Center

June Field. Monica Angle (1962- ). June Field. 2014 fluid acrylic on Rives BFK paper 42 X 42 inches courtesy of the artist. Profiles. Monica Angle.

June Field - World's Greatest Psychic - Shanklin Theatre

June Field, quoted as “Worlds Greatest Psychic” after taking part in a worldwide televised competition over 7 months where she battled against over 70000 ...

June Field - womeninpokerhalloffame.com

Some might not know June Field, but they benefit from her contribution to the poker world. Though she won a WSOP bracelet in the Ladies seven-card stud ...

Events | Community Education - Rochester Public Schools

SACC June Field Trips open online. Skip to Calendar. Events Submit. 0 Tags Applied. Academic Calendar. ECFE. CE. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun. Jul Aug

June Field Updates - Morro Bay National Estuary Program

Fulfilling our mission to protect and restore the Morro Bay estuary for people and animals requires a lot of hard work. Read our June field ...

June Field Research Tasks (LegendsLima) : r/TheSilphRoad - Reddit

June Field Research Tasks (LegendsLima). Infographic - Research. r/TheSilphRoad ...

June Field Notes - Edmonton & Area Land Trust

June Field Notes · June 22, 2021 · June 22, 2021 · Rebecca Ellis · Volunteering, EALT News, Stewardship. With field work season in full swing, ...

June Field Trip to the High Country - Platte Basin Timelapse

June Field Trip to the High Country. PBT Team. June 15, 2014. This week the PBT team is gathering footage and servicing timelapse camera systems in the ...

June Field Notes - CFESA

June Field Notes · President's Podcast · CFESA Region 5 & 6 Meeting · CFESA Cares Scholarship.

Show all results...

Search people online

Related searches:
Jimmy Field
Jimmy Field
Kayla Field
Kayla Field
Kristin Field
Kristin Field
Lara Martin
Lara Martin
Show more...

People Search:

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Continue
We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. More info