June Fraser

Found 40 people in California, Massachusetts, Florida and other states

June Fraser - @JuneFraser1 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFraser1

Ebbsfleet Kent

Start of a new chapter

June Fraser - @june_fraser - Twitter

June Fraser - @june_fraser

united kingdom

Follow @dionnefraser1

June Fraser - @JuneFra89362332 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFra89362332

Guyana

Humble and sexy

June Fraser - @june2sweet - Twitter

June Fraser - @june2sweet

Alness Village

Single sweet sexy

Pamela June Fraser - @PamelaJFraser - Twitter

Pamela June Fraser - @PamelaJFraser

Hamilton

Positive, free thinker who believes in the power of the law of attraction. Love to be inspired and connect with positive people.

June Fraser - @JuneFraser13 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFraser13

South East, England

Me

june fraser - @loveLelandC2011 - Twitter

june fraser - @loveLelandC2011

im a fan of john cena and randy orton and the dog the bounty hunter

june fraser - @mrsrockychick - Twitter

june fraser - @mrsrockychick

Worcester Park

rockysdisco.co.uk

June Fraser - @JuneFra43404913 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFra43404913

I'm a big fan of new kids on the block

june fraser - @junefraser5 - Twitter

june fraser - @junefraser5

lochgelly
June Fraser - @jksdevil82 - Twitter

June Fraser - @jksdevil82

St Hyacinthe,Quebec,Canada
June Fraser Thistle - @JuneThistle - Twitter

June Fraser Thistle - @JuneThistle

If I could spend every single day on an ocean beach looking for sea glass, well then life would be very good indeed!

June Fraser - @JuneFra05287666 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFra05287666

Townsville, Queensland
june fraser - @junejessebridge - Twitter

june fraser - @junejessebridge

June Fraser - @jafstuff2 - Twitter

June Fraser - @jafstuff2

june fraser - @junefraser6 - Twitter

june fraser - @junefraser6

June Fraser - @junefraser4 - Twitter

June Fraser - @junefraser4

June Fraser - @jafstuff - Twitter

June Fraser - @jafstuff

June Fraser - @JuneFraser59347 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFraser59347

June Fraser - @JuneFraser32266 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFraser32266

June Fraser - @JuneFra80544729 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFra80544729

June Fraser - @beaconworkplace - Twitter

June Fraser - @beaconworkplace

June Fraser - @JuneFraser32558 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFraser32558

June Fraser - @JuneFraser89760 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFraser89760

June fraser - @fraser_june - Twitter

June fraser - @fraser_june

June fraser - @Makita3103 - Twitter

June fraser - @Makita3103

JUNE FRASER - @JEMTFRASER - Twitter

JUNE FRASER - @JEMTFRASER

June fraser - @Junefraser - Twitter

June fraser - @Junefraser

June Fraser - @june50 - Twitter

June Fraser - @june50

June fraser - @JfJunefraser - Twitter

June fraser - @JfJunefraser

June Fraser - @JuneFraser121 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFraser121

JUNE FRASER - @VALETUDINARY - Twitter

JUNE FRASER - @VALETUDINARY

June Fraser - @sunshinej59 - Twitter

June Fraser - @sunshinej59

June Fraser - @WestiFraser - Twitter

June Fraser - @WestiFraser

june Fraser - @jollytune - Twitter

june Fraser - @jollytune

Joyce June Fraser - @JoyceJuneFrase1 - Twitter

Joyce June Fraser - @JoyceJuneFrase1

June Fraser - @wantmoretime - Twitter

June Fraser - @wantmoretime

June Fraser - @jfras3055 - Twitter

June Fraser - @jfras3055

June Fraser - @JuneFraser8 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFraser8

June Fraser - @Jumao - Twitter

June Fraser - @Jumao

June Fraser - @f8091696152740a - Twitter

June Fraser - @f8091696152740a

June Fraser - @JuneFraser7 - Twitter

June Fraser - @JuneFraser7

June Fraser - @endeavour121 - Twitter

June Fraser - @endeavour121

June Fraser - @junecharlie2 - Twitter

June Fraser - @junecharlie2

Wendy June Fraser - @WFraser501 - Twitter

Wendy June Fraser - @WFraser501

June Fraser - @junehelen8 - Twitter

June Fraser - @junehelen8

Ramona June Fraser - @FraserRamona - Twitter

Ramona June Fraser - @FraserRamona

june fraser - @junefraser9 - Twitter

june fraser - @junefraser9

june fraser - @junefraser2014 - Twitter

june fraser - @junefraser2014

PamelaJuneFraser - @PamJuneFraser - Twitter

PamelaJuneFraser - @PamJuneFraser

Hamilton, Ontario
Show all results...

Sponsored by SpokeoPaid Service

June R Fraser

K*****@gm2inc.com

***** Wilderness Rd, Rancho Cordova, CA

View full report

June A Fraser

C*****@hotmail.com — (951) 255-****

***** Harding St, Riverside, CA

View full report

June M Fraser

(978) 535-****

***** Brooksby Village Dr, Unit 627, Peabody, MA

View full report

June A Fraser

D*****@gmail.com — (973) 204-****

***** Nesbit Ter, Apt B, Irvington, NJ

View full report

June E Fraser

J*****@gmail.com — (850) 398-****

***** Victory Ln, Crestview, FL

View full report

June K Fraser

J*****@att.net — (949) 443-****

***** Via Miramar, Laguna Niguel, CA

June J Fraser

P*****@aol.com — (201) 945-****

***** Park Ave, Fairview, NJ

Show all results...

Sponsored by SpokeoPaid Service

junefr****@gmail.com

Search secret profiles for junefr****@gmail.com

Search

junefr****@yahoo.com

Search secret profiles for junefr****@yahoo.com

Search

June Fraser

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Search for contact info, city & state history, relatives, jobs, education & more

Search public records
June Fraser - Facebook

June Fraser

Valentine

Lives in Valentine
Works at Renewal Ranch

June Fraser - Facebook

June Fraser

Georgetown, Guyana

Lives in Georgetown, Guyana
Works at Guyana Police Force

June Fraser - Facebook

June Fraser

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Unlock Results

Search
June Fraser - Facebook

June Fraser

June Fraser - Facebook

June Fraser

Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec

Lives in Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec

June Fraser - Facebook

June Fraser

Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec

Lives in Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec

June Fraser - Facebook

June Fraser

Works at Happily Retired

June Fraser - Facebook

June Fraser

June Fraser Thistle, Independent Brand Partner, Nerium International - Facebook

June Fraser Thistle, Independent Brand Partner, Nerium International

Loving the way my skin feels with Nerium International!

June Fraser - Facebook

June Fraser

June Fraser - Facebook

June Fraser

Juneann Fraser - Facebook

Juneann Fraser

Show all results...
June Fraser - @june.fraser2 - TikTok

June Fraser - @june.fraser2

Humble and honest with a bit of spice ❤️
251 followers

June Fraser - @junefraser - TikTok

June Fraser - @junefraser

1 follower

june fraser - @june.fraser - TikTok

june fraser - @june.fraser

11 followers

June Fraser - @junefraser4 - TikTok

June Fraser - @junefraser4

to many violations geared towards free speech
2,402 followers

June Fraser - @junefraser7 - TikTok

June Fraser - @junefraser7

4 followers

June Fraser - @june.fraser0 - TikTok

June Fraser - @june.fraser0

127 followers

June Fraser - @junefraser3 - TikTok

June Fraser - @junefraser3

33 followers

June Fraser - @peblpi - TikTok

June Fraser - @peblpi

FREEDOM GOD BLESS THE TRUCKERS... 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦NOT HERE FOR RELATIONSHIP SO BACK

June Fraser - @omerzgknauo - TikTok

June Fraser - @omerzgknauo

June Woodard Fraser - @june.woodard.frase - TikTok

June Woodard Fraser - @june.woodard.frase

Wife
Mom
Nana
Christian
Love my babies! 💖💖💙💖
12 followers

junefraser - @june46324 - TikTok

junefraser - @june46324

Backup
6 followers

junefraser33 - @tips._.andfactsxx - TikTok

junefraser33 - @tips._.andfactsxx

I give u tips/facts/etc! Hope you enjoy <3
2 followers

Show all results...
junefraser
junefraser4
fraser_june
junefraserr
june.fraser.3956
june.fraser.14
june.fraser.562
june_fraser
junefraser7
jif0704
03makita
junjhr
junefraser1
junefra89362332
june2sweet
pamelajfraser
junefraser13
lovelelandc2011
mrsrockychick
junefra43404913
junefraser5
jksdevil82
junethistle
junefra05287666
junejessebridge
jafstuff2
junefraser6
jafstuff
junefraser59347
junefraser32266
junefra80544729
beaconworkplace
junefraser32558
junefraser89760
makita3103
jemtfraser
june50
jfjunefraser
junefraser121
valetudinary
sunshinej59
westifraser
jollytune
joycejunefrase1
wantmoretime
jfras3055
junefraser8
jumao
f8091696152740a
endeavour121
junecharlie2
wfraser501
junehelen8
fraserramona
junefraser9
junefraser2014
pamjunefraser
june.fraser.3958
june.fraser.148
june.fraser.3
nerium.junefraserthistle
juneann.fraser.5
june.fraser2
june.fraser
june.fraser0
junefraser3
peblpi
omerzgknauo
june.woodard.frase
june46324
tips._.andfactsxx
junefraser4462
junefraser8792
junefraser9663
*whimzie*
junetim
junefraser92
fraser5141
fraser4050
jfraser3341
mammajune29
junefraser2011
jfraser3487
junefraserreid
djune59
wandajunef
junefraser51
junefraser58
cumberland3306
junefraser792
junebfraser
nannyj5953
29junefra
junefraserjf
junefraser18
3redchicks
junekurashiiki
whatislegitimateexpectationobv
jwfraser1959
jfraser1828
fraser1778
junali69
jbborrower
sexy47jf
fraser1794
fraser1280
chihuahuamika
june4074
nerissasmith1951
june3573
junemfraser
junefraser4928
fraser1789
fraserjune2
fraserj154
jpseymour6
auntiejune0373
junefraser0847
fraserjune
fraser_june09
trainor824
whim
jwf58
Show all results...
June Fraser - LinkedIn

June Fraser

New York

swim official - Section 4

June Fraser - LinkedIn

June Fraser

Burlington, MA

Service Advisor at Herb chambers honda

June Fraser - LinkedIn

June Fraser

June Fraser Thistle - LinkedIn

June Fraser Thistle

Western Washington University

June Fraser - LinkedIn

June Fraser

Cordele

Patient Acct Rep - Crisp Regional Hospital

June fraser - LinkedIn

June fraser

Greater Dundee Area

company director at People for U

June Fraser - LinkedIn

June Fraser

Disability support

Connie Coleman - LinkedIn

Connie Coleman

Ossining, NY

Maryknoll Sisters
Education: College of New Rochelle

Marcella Grant, MBA - LinkedIn

Marcella Grant, MBA

Fayetteville

Academic Tutor
Experience: Self-employed
Education: University of Maryland Global Campus

Kristine Zelinka - LinkedIn

Kristine Zelinka

Portland

Information Office Mgr. at Concordia University ...

Kathleen Phelps - LinkedIn

Kathleen Phelps

Glen 

Anne Arundel Community College
Education: Anne Arundel Community College

Jacob Lange - LinkedIn

Jacob Lange

Cape Coral Metropolitan Area

Service Advisor at Germain Honda
Education: Florida SouthWestern State College

Courtney Steele - LinkedIn

Courtney Steele

Louisville Metropolitan 

Express Service Advisor at Neil Huffman Honda
Education: University of Louisville

Christina Choi, Ph.D. - LinkedIn

Christina Choi, Ph.D.

Field Application Specialist at Hologic, Inc.

Dibisha Ranabhat Poudel - LinkedIn

Dibisha Ranabhat Poudel

Senior Business Support Supervisor at ...

Judi Redford - LinkedIn

Judi Redford

Greater Adelaide Area

Donor Services Nursing Assistant at Redcross Blood ...
Experience: Redcross Blood Service

Shilu Poudel - LinkedIn

Shilu Poudel

Mount Lawley

Nursing Assistant at Meath Care

Krista Lee - LinkedIn

Krista Lee

Fayetteville

Client Service Associate at Morgan Stanley
Education: Methodist University

Karl Heinz - LinkedIn

Karl Heinz

Western Washington University
Education: Michigan State University ...

Show all results...

June (Baribeau) Fraser

  • Lynn English High School (1975 - 1979)

    Lynn, MA

June (Woodard) Fraser

  • Crisp County High School (1973 - 1977)

    Cordele, GA

June Fraser

  • St. Pius V High School (1970 - 1974)

    Bronx, NY

June (Fraser) Fraser Thistle

  • M.E. Lazerte High School (1970 - 1974)

    Edmonton, AB

June (Fraser) King

  • Aledo High School (1966 - 1970)

    Aledo, TX

June (Fraser) Hickey

  • Watertown High School (1965 - 1969)

    Watertown, MA

June Fraser

  • Arlington High School (1962 - 1966)

    Arlington, MA

June Fraser

  • Arlington High School (1961 - 1965)

    Arlington, MA

June Fraser

  • Robert E. Lee High School (1959 - 1963)

    Montgomery, AL

June (Fraser) Crilly

  • Grover Cleveland High School (1956 - 1960)

    Ridgewood, NY

June (Fraser) Cook

  • Lincoln High School (1947 - 1951)

    Ferndale, MI

Show all results...

June Fraser

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Search for June Fraser's city and state history

Search address history
June Rose Fraser - Obituary

June Rose Fraser

Duffau, TX

Died: January 13, 2024 (aged 97)
Born: April 27, 1926

June Seulsang Yun Fraser

Arlington, VA

Died: December 26, 2022 (aged 87)
Born: January 31, 1935

June Marie Lee Fraser - Obituary

June Marie Lee Fraser

San Bruno, CA

Died: December 29, 2019 (aged 96)
Born: October 25, 1923

June A. Erickson Fraser - Obituary

June A. Erickson Fraser

Exeter, RI

Died: October 27, 2016 (aged 80)
Born: December 30, 1935

June Delight Lowell Fraser - Obituary

June Delight Lowell Fraser

Windham, ME

Died: February 2, 2013 (aged 89)
Born: June 3, 1923

Websites owned by June Fraser

cull-fraser.co.uk

Registered on November 18, 2013

tpets.store

Registered on August 5, 2017

June Fraser - @*whimzie* - Flickr

June Fraser - @*whimzie*

0 photos - 0 followers

June Fraser - @jif0704 - Flickr

June Fraser - @jif0704

0 photos - 0 followers

June Fraser - @junetim - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junetim

107 followers

June Fraser - @junefraser92 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junefraser92

0 followers

June Fraser - @fraser5141 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @fraser5141

0 followers

June Fraser - @fraser4050 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @fraser4050

0 followers

June Fraser - @jfraser3341 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @jfraser3341

0 followers

June Fraser - @mammajune29 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @mammajune29

0 followers

June Fraser - @junefraser2011 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junefraser2011

0 followers

June Fraser - @jfraser3487 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @jfraser3487

0 followers

June Fraser-Reid - @junefraserreid - Pinterest

June Fraser-Reid - @junefraserreid

0 followers

D.june Fraser - @djune59 - Pinterest

D.june Fraser - @djune59

0 followers

Wanda June Fraser - @wandajunef - Pinterest

Wanda June Fraser - @wandajunef

9 followers

June Fraser - @junefraser51 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junefraser51

35 followers

June Fraser - @03makita - Pinterest

June Fraser - @03makita

16 followers

June Fraser - @junefraser58 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junefraser58

17 followers

June Fraser - @cumberland3306 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @cumberland3306

3 followers

June Fraser - @junefraser792 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junefraser792

2 followers

June Fraser - @junebfraser - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junebfraser

1 follower

June Fraser - @nannyj5953 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @nannyj5953

0 followers

June Fraser - @29junefra - Pinterest

June Fraser - @29junefra

0 followers

June Fraser - @junefraserjf - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junefraserjf

0 followers

June Fraser - @junefraser18 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junefraser18

0 followers

Crystal June Fraser - @3redchicks - Pinterest

Crystal June Fraser - @3redchicks

16 followers

June Fraser - @junekurashiiki - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junekurashiiki

1 follower

"What is legitimate expectation? Obviously, it is not a legal right. It is an expectation of a benefit, relief or remedy that may ordinarily flow from a promise or established practice. The term 'established practice' refers to a regular, consistent predictable and certain conduct, process or activity of the decision-making authority. The expectation should be legitimate, that is, reasonable, logical and valid. Any expectation which is based on sporadic or casual or random acts, or which is unreasonable, illogical or invalid cannot be a legitimate expectation. Not being a right, it is not enforceable as such. It is a concept fashioned by courts, for judicial review of administrative action. It is procedural in character based on the requirement of a higher degree of fairness in administrative action, as a consequence of the promise made, or practice established." [2006 (8) SCJ 721] In order to maintain the balance between the continuously evolving freedom of individuals and state authority, the Administrative law has to also evolve itself to suit the needs and expectations of people and their rights and duties. There are several principles of Administrative Law, which have been evolved by the courts for the purpose of controlling the exercise of power so that it does not lead to arbitrariness or abuse of power. These principles are intended to provide safeguard to the citizens against abuse or misuse of power by the instrumentalities or agencies of the State. One of the latest and important of these principles is the 'doctrine of legitimate expectation', which is an outcome of synthesis between the principle of administrative fairness (a component of the principles of natural justice) and the rule of estoppel1. Legitimate Expectations, are different from Expectations at large, and are not Legal rights, but are expectation of benefits, relief/remedy that accrues from a promise or established practices, and give rise to locus standi to a person to seek judicial review of any action, of State or its subsidiaries, which are arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair, malicious in law, devoid of Rule of law and violative of the principles of Natural Justice2. Origin The evolvement of the doctrine of Legitimate Expectation in the Common law jurisdiction can been traced to an obiter dictum of Lord Denning M. R in Sehmidt v. Secretary of Home Affairs3. Lord Denning observed in Sehmidt: "The speeches in Ridge v Baldwin show that an administrative body may, in a proper case, be bound to give a person who is affected by their decision an opportunity of making representations. It all depends on whether he has some right or interest or I would add, some legitimate expectation, of which it would not be fair to deprive him without hearing what he has to say ...." In this case certain non national students at Hubbard College of Scientology had been given leave to enter the United Kingdom before July, 1968, initially for a period of a month. The periods had been extended to the end of August and September 1968, respectively. Applications were made on behalf of the plaintiffs to the Home Office on June 11 and July 15, 1968 for extensions of their stay until November and December 1968, to complete their studies. By letters of July 29 and 30 the Home Secretary, the defendant, rejected the applications. The plaintiff's stay was, however, extended to September 30 to let them make arrangements to leave. The Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and 50 other alien students of the college, claimed declarations against the defendant that his decision not to consider further similar applications for extension of stay was unlawful, void, and of no effect and the defendant was bound to consider such applications on their merit and in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The court of appeal held that they had no legitimate expectation of extension and therefore no right to hearing, though revocation of their permits within the earlier granted period of permit would have been contrary to legitimate expectation. The legitimate expectation referred to in, this case did not give the alien students an enforceable right to stay for the time originally permitted but an enforceable right to be heard before the decision to revoke his permit was taken: a procedural protection only4. Evolution in India As already stated that the Doctrine of "Legitimate Expectation " is not a legal right in itself embedded in some statute of Code readily available for its inference and applicability. However it is a right to be treated fairly and the same has been fashioned by judicial precedents of various courts over a period time and is still in its evolving stage. The Supreme Court in M/S Sethi Auto Service Station vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors5. has examined the concept of 'legitimate expectation'. While dealing with the question of allotment of a plot by the DDA, the Supreme Court has enumerated various decisions of the concept of Legitimate Expectation and examined the law relating thereto. The Court held as under; "19. The protection of legitimate expectations, as pointed out in De Smith's Judicial Review (Sixth Edition) (para 12-001), is at the root of the constitutional principle of the rule of law, which requires regularity, predictability, and certainty in government's dealings with the public. The doctrine of legitimate expectation and its impact in the administrative law has been considered by this Court in a catena of decisions but for the sake of brevity we do not propose to refer to all these cases. Nevertheless, in order to appreciate the concept, we shall refer to a few decisions. At this juncture, we deem it necessary to refer to a decision by the House of Lords in Council of Civil Service Unions & Ors. Vs. Minister for the Civil Service, a locus classicus on the subject, wherein for the first time an attempt was made to give a comprehensive definition to the principle of legitimate expectation. Enunciating the basic principles relating to legitimate expectation, Lord Diplock observed that for a legitimate expectation to arise, the decision of the administrative authority must affect such person either (a) by altering rights or obligations of that person which are enforceable by or against him in private law or; (b) by depriving him of some benefit or advantage which either: (i) he has in the past been permitted by the decision maker to enjoy and which he can legitimately expect to be permitted to continue to do until some rational ground for withdrawing it has been communicated to him and he has been given an opportunity to comment thereon or (ii) he has received assurance from the decisionmaker that they will not be withdrawn without first giving him an opportunity of advancing reasons for contending that they should be withdrawn. 20. In Attorney General of Hong Kong Vs. Ng Yuen Shiu, a leading case on the subject, Lord Fraser said: "when a public authority has promised to follow a certain procedure, it is in the interest of good administration that it should act fairly and should implement its promise, so long as the implementation does not interfere with in its statutory duty". 21. Explaining the nature and scope of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in Food Corporation of India Vs. M/s Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, a three-Judge Bench of this Court had observed thus: "The mere reasonable or legitimate expectation of a citizen, in such a situation, may not by itself be a distinct enforceable right, but failure to consider and give due weight to it may render the decision arbitrary, and this is how the requirement of due consideration of a legitimate expectation forms part of the principle of non-arbitrariness, a necessary concomitant of the rule of law. Every legitimate expectation is a relevant factor requiring due consideration in a fair decision-making process. Whether the expectation of the claimant is reasonable or legitimate in the context is a question of fact in each case. Whenever the question arises, it is to be determined not according to the claimant's perception but in larger public interest wherein other more important considerations may outweigh what would otherwise have been the legitimate expectation of the claimant. A bona fide decision of the public authority reached in this manner would satisfy the requirement of nonarbitrariness and withstand judicial scrutiny. The doctrine of legitimate expectation gets assimilated in the rule of law and operates in our legal system in this manner and to this extent." 22. The concept of legitimate expectation again came up for consideration in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Hindustan Development Corporation & Ors. Referring to a large number of foreign and Indian decisions, including in Council of Civil Service Unions and Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries (supra) and elaborately explaining the concept of legitimate expectation, it was observed as under: "If a denial of legitimate expectation in a given case amounts to denial of right guaranteed or is arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair or biased, gross abuse of power or violation of principles of natural justice, the same can be questioned on the well-known grounds attracting Article 14 but a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It can be one of the grounds to consider but the court must lift the veil and see whether the decision is violative of these principles warranting interference. It depends very much on the facts and the recognized general principles of administrative law applicable to such facts and the concept of legitimate expectation which is the latest recruit to a long list of concepts fashioned by the courts for the review of administrative action, must be restricted to the general legal limitations applicable and binding the manner of the future exercise of administrative power in a particular case. It follows that the concept of legitimate expectation is "not the key which unlocks the treasury of natural justice and it ought not unlock the gate which shuts the court out of review on the merits", particularly when the element of speculation and uncertainty is inherent in that very concept." 23. Taking note of the observations of the Australian High Court in Attorney General for New South Wales Vs. Quinn that, "to strike down the exercise of administrative power solely on the ground of avoiding the disappointment of the legitimate expectations of an individual would be to set the Courts adrift on a featureless sea of pragmatism", speaking for the Bench, K. Jayachandra Reddy, J. said that there are stronger reasons as to why the legitimate expectation should not be substantively protected than the reasons as to why it should be protected. The caution sounded in the said Australian case that the Courts should restrain themselves and restrict such claims duly to the legal limitations was also endorsed. 24. Then again in National Buildings Construction Corporation Vs. S. Raghunathan & Ors., a three-Judge Bench of this Court observed as under: "The doctrine of "legitimate expectation" has its genesis in the field of administrative law. The Government and its departments, in administering the affairs of the country, are expected to honour their statements of policy or intention and treat the citizens with full personal consideration without any iota of abuse of discretion. The policy statements cannot be disregarded unfairly or applied selectively. Unfairness in the form of unreasonableness is akin to violation of natural justice. It was in this context that the doctrine of "legitimate expectation" was evolved which today has become a source of substantive as well as procedural rights. But claims based on "legitimate expectation" have been held to require reliance on representations and resulting detriment to the claimant in the same way as claims based on promissory estoppel." 25. This Court in Punjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors., referring to a large number of authorities on the question, observed that a change in policy can defeat a substantive legitimate expectation if it can be justified on "Wednesbury" reasonableness. The decision maker has the choice in the balancing of the pros and cons relevant to the change in policy. Therefore, the choice of the policy is for the decision maker and not for the Court. The legitimate substantive expectation, merely permits the Court to find out if the change in policy which is the cause for defeating the legitimate expectation is irrational or perverse or one which no reasonable person could have made. (Also see: Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer & Ors. 26. Very recently in Jitendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. It has been reiterated that a legitimate expectation is not the same thing as anticipation. It is distinct and different from a desire and hope. It is based on a right. It is grounded in the rule of law as requiring regularity, predictability and certainty in the Government's dealings with the public and the doctrine of legitimate expectation operates both in procedural and substantive matters. An examination of the afore-noted few decisions shows that the golden thread running through all these decisions is that a case for applicability of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, now accepted in the subjective sense as part of our legal jurisprudence, arises when an administrative body by reason of a representation or by past practice or conduct aroused an expectation which it would be within its powers to fulfill unless some overriding public interest comes in the way. However, a person who bases his claim on the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in the first instance, has to satisfy that he has relied on the said representation and the denial of that expectation has worked to his detriment. The Court could interfere only if the decision taken by the authority was found to be arbitrary, unreasonable or in gross abuse of power or in violation of principles of natural justice and not taken in public interest. But a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It is well settled that the concept of legitimate expectation has no role to play where the State action is as a public policy or in the public interest unless the action taken amounts to an abuse of power. The court must not usurp the discretion of the public authority which is empowered to take the decisions under law and the court is expected to apply an objective standard which leaves to the deciding authority the full range of choice which the legislature is presumed to have intended. Even in a case where the decision is left entirely to the discretion of the deciding authority without any such legal bounds and if the decision is taken fairly and objectively, the court will not interfere on the ground of procedural fairness to a person whose interest based on legitimate expectation might be affected. Therefore, a legitimate expectation can at the most be one of the grounds which may give rise to judicial review but the granting of relief is very much limited. - @whatislegitimateexpectationobv - Pinterest

"What is legitimate expectation? Obviously, it is not a legal right. It is an expectation of a benefit, relief or remedy that may ordinarily flow from a promise or established practice. The term 'established practice' refers to a regular, consistent predictable and certain conduct, process or activity of the decision-making authority. The expectation should be legitimate, that is, reasonable, logical and valid. Any expectation which is based on sporadic or casual or random acts, or which is unreasonable, illogical or invalid cannot be a legitimate expectation. Not being a right, it is not enforceable as such. It is a concept fashioned by courts, for judicial review of administrative action. It is procedural in character based on the requirement of a higher degree of fairness in administrative action, as a consequence of the promise made, or practice established." [2006 (8) SCJ 721] In order to maintain the balance between the continuously evolving freedom of individuals and state authority, the Administrative law has to also evolve itself to suit the needs and expectations of people and their rights and duties. There are several principles of Administrative Law, which have been evolved by the courts for the purpose of controlling the exercise of power so that it does not lead to arbitrariness or abuse of power. These principles are intended to provide safeguard to the citizens against abuse or misuse of power by the instrumentalities or agencies of the State. One of the latest and important of these principles is the 'doctrine of legitimate expectation', which is an outcome of synthesis between the principle of administrative fairness (a component of the principles of natural justice) and the rule of estoppel1. Legitimate Expectations, are different from Expectations at large, and are not Legal rights, but are expectation of benefits, relief/remedy that accrues from a promise or established practices, and give rise to locus standi to a person to seek judicial review of any action, of State or its subsidiaries, which are arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair, malicious in law, devoid of Rule of law and violative of the principles of Natural Justice2. Origin The evolvement of the doctrine of Legitimate Expectation in the Common law jurisdiction can been traced to an obiter dictum of Lord Denning M. R in Sehmidt v. Secretary of Home Affairs3. Lord Denning observed in Sehmidt: "The speeches in Ridge v Baldwin show that an administrative body may, in a proper case, be bound to give a person who is affected by their decision an opportunity of making representations. It all depends on whether he has some right or interest or I would add, some legitimate expectation, of which it would not be fair to deprive him without hearing what he has to say ...." In this case certain non national students at Hubbard College of Scientology had been given leave to enter the United Kingdom before July, 1968, initially for a period of a month. The periods had been extended to the end of August and September 1968, respectively. Applications were made on behalf of the plaintiffs to the Home Office on June 11 and July 15, 1968 for extensions of their stay until November and December 1968, to complete their studies. By letters of July 29 and 30 the Home Secretary, the defendant, rejected the applications. The plaintiff's stay was, however, extended to September 30 to let them make arrangements to leave. The Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and 50 other alien students of the college, claimed declarations against the defendant that his decision not to consider further similar applications for extension of stay was unlawful, void, and of no effect and the defendant was bound to consider such applications on their merit and in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The court of appeal held that they had no legitimate expectation of extension and therefore no right to hearing, though revocation of their permits within the earlier granted period of permit would have been contrary to legitimate expectation. The legitimate expectation referred to in, this case did not give the alien students an enforceable right to stay for the time originally permitted but an enforceable right to be heard before the decision to revoke his permit was taken: a procedural protection only4. Evolution in India As already stated that the Doctrine of "Legitimate Expectation " is not a legal right in itself embedded in some statute of Code readily available for its inference and applicability. However it is a right to be treated fairly and the same has been fashioned by judicial precedents of various courts over a period time and is still in its evolving stage. The Supreme Court in M/S Sethi Auto Service Station vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors5. has examined the concept of 'legitimate expectation'. While dealing with the question of allotment of a plot by the DDA, the Supreme Court has enumerated various decisions of the concept of Legitimate Expectation and examined the law relating thereto. The Court held as under; "19. The protection of legitimate expectations, as pointed out in De Smith's Judicial Review (Sixth Edition) (para 12-001), is at the root of the constitutional principle of the rule of law, which requires regularity, predictability, and certainty in government's dealings with the public. The doctrine of legitimate expectation and its impact in the administrative law has been considered by this Court in a catena of decisions but for the sake of brevity we do not propose to refer to all these cases. Nevertheless, in order to appreciate the concept, we shall refer to a few decisions. At this juncture, we deem it necessary to refer to a decision by the House of Lords in Council of Civil Service Unions & Ors. Vs. Minister for the Civil Service, a locus classicus on the subject, wherein for the first time an attempt was made to give a comprehensive definition to the principle of legitimate expectation. Enunciating the basic principles relating to legitimate expectation, Lord Diplock observed that for a legitimate expectation to arise, the decision of the administrative authority must affect such person either (a) by altering rights or obligations of that person which are enforceable by or against him in private law or; (b) by depriving him of some benefit or advantage which either: (i) he has in the past been permitted by the decision maker to enjoy and which he can legitimately expect to be permitted to continue to do until some rational ground for withdrawing it has been communicated to him and he has been given an opportunity to comment thereon or (ii) he has received assurance from the decisionmaker that they will not be withdrawn without first giving him an opportunity of advancing reasons for contending that they should be withdrawn. 20. In Attorney General of Hong Kong Vs. Ng Yuen Shiu, a leading case on the subject, Lord Fraser said: "when a public authority has promised to follow a certain procedure, it is in the interest of good administration that it should act fairly and should implement its promise, so long as the implementation does not interfere with in its statutory duty". 21. Explaining the nature and scope of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in Food Corporation of India Vs. M/s Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, a three-Judge Bench of this Court had observed thus: "The mere reasonable or legitimate expectation of a citizen, in such a situation, may not by itself be a distinct enforceable right, but failure to consider and give due weight to it may render the decision arbitrary, and this is how the requirement of due consideration of a legitimate expectation forms part of the principle of non-arbitrariness, a necessary concomitant of the rule of law. Every legitimate expectation is a relevant factor requiring due consideration in a fair decision-making process. Whether the expectation of the claimant is reasonable or legitimate in the context is a question of fact in each case. Whenever the question arises, it is to be determined not according to the claimant's perception but in larger public interest wherein other more important considerations may outweigh what would otherwise have been the legitimate expectation of the claimant. A bona fide decision of the public authority reached in this manner would satisfy the requirement of nonarbitrariness and withstand judicial scrutiny. The doctrine of legitimate expectation gets assimilated in the rule of law and operates in our legal system in this manner and to this extent." 22. The concept of legitimate expectation again came up for consideration in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Hindustan Development Corporation & Ors. Referring to a large number of foreign and Indian decisions, including in Council of Civil Service Unions and Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries (supra) and elaborately explaining the concept of legitimate expectation, it was observed as under: "If a denial of legitimate expectation in a given case amounts to denial of right guaranteed or is arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair or biased, gross abuse of power or violation of principles of natural justice, the same can be questioned on the well-known grounds attracting Article 14 but a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It can be one of the grounds to consider but the court must lift the veil and see whether the decision is violative of these principles warranting interference. It depends very much on the facts and the recognized general principles of administrative law applicable to such facts and the concept of legitimate expectation which is the latest recruit to a long list of concepts fashioned by the courts for the review of administrative action, must be restricted to the general legal limitations applicable and binding the manner of the future exercise of administrative power in a particular case. It follows that the concept of legitimate expectation is "not the key which unlocks the treasury of natural justice and it ought not unlock the gate which shuts the court out of review on the merits", particularly when the element of speculation and uncertainty is inherent in that very concept." 23. Taking note of the observations of the Australian High Court in Attorney General for New South Wales Vs. Quinn that, "to strike down the exercise of administrative power solely on the ground of avoiding the disappointment of the legitimate expectations of an individual would be to set the Courts adrift on a featureless sea of pragmatism", speaking for the Bench, K. Jayachandra Reddy, J. said that there are stronger reasons as to why the legitimate expectation should not be substantively protected than the reasons as to why it should be protected. The caution sounded in the said Australian case that the Courts should restrain themselves and restrict such claims duly to the legal limitations was also endorsed. 24. Then again in National Buildings Construction Corporation Vs. S. Raghunathan & Ors., a three-Judge Bench of this Court observed as under: "The doctrine of "legitimate expectation" has its genesis in the field of administrative law. The Government and its departments, in administering the affairs of the country, are expected to honour their statements of policy or intention and treat the citizens with full personal consideration without any iota of abuse of discretion. The policy statements cannot be disregarded unfairly or applied selectively. Unfairness in the form of unreasonableness is akin to violation of natural justice. It was in this context that the doctrine of "legitimate expectation" was evolved which today has become a source of substantive as well as procedural rights. But claims based on "legitimate expectation" have been held to require reliance on representations and resulting detriment to the claimant in the same way as claims based on promissory estoppel." 25. This Court in Punjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors., referring to a large number of authorities on the question, observed that a change in policy can defeat a substantive legitimate expectation if it can be justified on "Wednesbury" reasonableness. The decision maker has the choice in the balancing of the pros and cons relevant to the change in policy. Therefore, the choice of the policy is for the decision maker and not for the Court. The legitimate substantive expectation, merely permits the Court to find out if the change in policy which is the cause for defeating the legitimate expectation is irrational or perverse or one which no reasonable person could have made. (Also see: Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer & Ors. 26. Very recently in Jitendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. It has been reiterated that a legitimate expectation is not the same thing as anticipation. It is distinct and different from a desire and hope. It is based on a right. It is grounded in the rule of law as requiring regularity, predictability and certainty in the Government's dealings with the public and the doctrine of legitimate expectation operates both in procedural and substantive matters. An examination of the afore-noted few decisions shows that the golden thread running through all these decisions is that a case for applicability of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, now accepted in the subjective sense as part of our legal jurisprudence, arises when an administrative body by reason of a representation or by past practice or conduct aroused an expectation which it would be within its powers to fulfill unless some overriding public interest comes in the way. However, a person who bases his claim on the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in the first instance, has to satisfy that he has relied on the said representation and the denial of that expectation has worked to his detriment. The Court could interfere only if the decision taken by the authority was found to be arbitrary, unreasonable or in gross abuse of power or in violation of principles of natural justice and not taken in public interest. But a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It is well settled that the concept of legitimate expectation has no role to play where the State action is as a public policy or in the public interest unless the action taken amounts to an abuse of power. The court must not usurp the discretion of the public authority which is empowered to take the decisions under law and the court is expected to apply an objective standard which leaves to the deciding authority the full range of choice which the legislature is presumed to have intended. Even in a case where the decision is left entirely to the discretion of the deciding authority without any such legal bounds and if the decision is taken fairly and objectively, the court will not interfere on the ground of procedural fairness to a person whose interest based on legitimate expectation might be affected. Therefore, a legitimate expectation can at the most be one of the grounds which may give rise to judicial review but the granting of relief is very much limited. - @whatislegitimateexpectationobv

2,087 followers

June Fraser - @jwfraser1959 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @jwfraser1959

0 followers

June Fraser - @jfraser1828 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @jfraser1828

0 followers

June Fraser - @junefraser - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junefraser

0 followers

June Fraser - @fraser1778 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @fraser1778

0 followers

June Fraser - @junali69 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junali69

0 followers

june fraser - @jbborrower - Pinterest

june fraser - @jbborrower

0 followers

June Fraser - @sexy47jf - Pinterest

June Fraser - @sexy47jf

0 followers

June Fraser - @fraser1794 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @fraser1794

0 followers

June Fraser - @fraser1280 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @fraser1280

3 followers

June Fraser - @chihuahuamika - Pinterest

June Fraser - @chihuahuamika

0 followers

June Fraser - @june4074 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @june4074

0 followers

June Fraser - @junjhr - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junjhr

0 followers

June Fraser - @jif0704 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @jif0704

0 followers

June Fraser - @nerissasmith1951 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @nerissasmith1951

1 follower

june fraser - @june_fraser - Pinterest

june fraser - @june_fraser

0 followers

June fraser - @june3573 - Pinterest

June fraser - @june3573

0 followers

June fraser - @junemfraser - Pinterest

June fraser - @junemfraser

0 followers

June Fraser - @junefraser4928 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @junefraser4928

0 followers

June Fraser - @fraser1789 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @fraser1789

0 followers

June Fraser - @fraserjune2 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @fraserjune2

0 followers

June Fraser - @fraserj154 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @fraserj154

0 followers

June Fraser - @jpseymour6 - Pinterest

June Fraser - @jpseymour6

0 followers

june fraser - @auntiejune0373 - Pinterest

june fraser - @auntiejune0373

0 followers

Junefraser - @junefraser0847 - Pinterest

Junefraser - @junefraser0847

0 followers

Fraser June - @fraserjune - Pinterest

Fraser June - @fraserjune

0 followers

Fraser June - @fraser_june09 - Pinterest

Fraser June - @fraser_june09

0 followers

Show all results...

Obituary | June A. Fraser of Mount Morris, New York

June A. Fraser age 90 of Mount Morris, New York, died Sunday January 19, 2025 at her home in Mount Morris.

June Fraser Obituary (2006) - Newark, NJ - The Star-Ledger

June Fraser Obituary. FRASER - June, on Jan. ... FRASER - June, on Jan. 23, beloved wife on Angus, devoted mother of Beverly and Gerald Dalzell, ...

June Fraser - Employee Ratings - DealerRater.com

541 Reviews of June Fraser ; July 27, 2025 · I had excellent service support from June. · by trochford · Jul 29, 2025 ; July 22, 2025 · Ashley is great! · by lacomis59.

June FRASER Obituary (2025) - The Post - Legacy.com

June FRASER Obituary ... Passed away peacefully at Carter Court on 8th April 2025. Dearly loved wife of the late Ian; Much loved mother and mother ...

Obituary information for Sandra June Fraser - East Coast Memorial

View Sandra June Fraser's obituary, contribute to their memorial, see their funeral service details, and more.

June Fraser Thistle | On-Campus Housing | Western Washington ...

June Fraser Thistle. She/Her Office Manager. Office Location. EH 113. fraserj3@wwu.edu. About. Bio coming soon. June. UR logo. Contact University Residences.

June Fraser - NYPL Digital Collections

Item data. Title. June Fraser. Collection. Billy Rose Theatre Division photograph file · Personalities · F · June Fraser [1917-1992]. Date / Origin.

June Fraser Archives - Logobook

Designers June Fraser. Slinger Group. June Fraser. Marler Haley. June Fraser · Letters & Numbers.

June Fraser | Swimcloud

June Fraser's swimmer profile, including times, results, and more ... June Fraser. Forest Lake, MN; Forest Lake High School · Home Meets Times Rankings. More ...

June Fraser obituary | Graphic design | The Guardian

June Fraser, who has died aged 88, was a pioneering graphic designer. She began her career in the 1950s at Design Research Unit, a multidisciplinary London ...

June Fraser Obituary - Death Notice and Service Information

June Fraser formerly of Rosebank on January 23, 2006. Beloved wife of Angus. Devoted mother of Beverly and Gerald Dalzell, Adrienne and Philip Scodary and ...

Obituary of June Fraser - Westville - Eagles Funeral Home

Arlene "June" Fraser, 68 of Westville passed away on Thursday, December 27, 2016 in the Aberdeen Hospital, New Glasgow, with her family at her side.

June Fraser Obituary | 2025 - 2025 | Hamilton Spectator

June Fraser passed away on April 18, 2025. This is the full obituary where you can express condolences and share memories. Published in the Hamilton ...

Jazoni June Fraser Obituary October 18, 2024 - Kniffen O'Malley ...

An obituary is not available at this time for Jazoni June Fraser. We welcome you to provide your thoughts and memories on our Tribute Wall.

June FRASER personal appointments - Companies House - GOV.UK

June FRASER ; 18 GREVILLE ROAD (MANAGEMENT) LIMITED (01553260) · Active · Director ; 108 HAMILTON TERRACE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED (02658589) · Dissolved · Director.

Obituary | Lorraine June Fraser

Lorraine June Fraser (nee Stevens). September 5,1922 - August 8, 2024. With profound sorrow, we announce the peaceful passing of Lorraine ...

June Fraser Obituary - Hamilton, ON - Dignity Memorial

Celebrate the life of June Fraser, leave a kind word or memory and get funeral service information care of Cresmount Funeral Home.

Brooke D'Orsay - June in January (TV Movie 2014) - IMDb

June in January (TV Movie 2014) - Brooke D'Orsay as June Fraser.

June Fraser (Inverness) - William T Fraser & Son

19.09.1938 – 02.07.2025. Peacefully, on Wednesday 2nd July 2025 at Raigmore Hospital, June Fraser née Tuach, 14 Caledonian Road, Inverness, aged 86 years.

Service information for June Fraser | Eagles Funeral Home - Proudly...

June Fraser. Tuesday, December 27, 2016. Service Information. Obituary · Tribute Wall · Service Information · Memories. Share / Subscribe to this tribute.

June Fraser Thistle - WWU News - Western Washington University

Subscribe to June Fraser Thistle. Get the Latest News. Subscribe To Push Notifications. Tribal Lands Statement. Western Washington University's main campus is ...

June Fraser | Obituary Condolences | Hamilton Spectator

June Fraser passed awayView condolences and share memories in the guestbook.

Obituary information for June Fraser - Jones Funeral Home

June Fraser Obituary. Regretfully we must inform friends and neighbours that June passed away peacefully on Oct 29. June is survived by sons ...

Blog: A Letter from June Fraser Thistle - ACLU of Colorado

Blog: A Letter from June Fraser Thistle. I am writing to ask you to support SB21-062 because had this bill been law, it could have saved my ...

June FRASER personal appointments - Companies House - GOV.UK

June FRASER. Filter appointments. Filter appointments. Current appointments. Total number of appointments 1. Date of birth: February 1959. HJF59 LTD (SC538426).

Show all results...

Search people online

Related searches:
Judy King
Judy King
Julie Fraser
Julie Fraser
Karen Laplante
Karen Laplante
Kenneth Fraser
Kenneth Fraser
Show more...

People Search:

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Continue
We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. More info