People Search
J
June...Hoff
June Heard

June Heard

Found 31 people in Georgia, Texas, Illinois and other states

Instagram

June Heard - @june.heard

June Heard - @heardjune

June Heard

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Unlock Results

June Heard - @june.heard.3

June Heard - @juneheard69

June Heard - @juneheard714

June Heard - @june.3305

June Heard - @june.heard.142

June Heard - @jiheard9

June Heard - @juneheard64

June Heard - @juneheard10

June Heard - @juneheard8

@juneheard

Juneheard - @johndough316

sharon juneheard - @juneheardsharon

Show all results...

Twitter

Sharon june heard - @Sharonjunehea11

England

I live in cramilngton

Sharon June Heard - @SharonJuneHear2

Cramlington, England

News Music Weather Entertainment YouTube Pop YouTube Food Books Television Movies Sports Football Tennis Formula 1 Animals

June Heard - @JuneHeard

junedidgood.com

Storyteller in training. Filmmaker wannabe. This is where I exercise my imagination - 140 characters at a time. I hope you like my stories!

June Heard - @HeardJune5168

June Heard - @heard_june

June Heard - @HeardJune6711

June Heard - @JuneHeard5

June Heard - @JuneHeard4

Sharon June heard - @SharonJunehea12

June heard - @Juneheard6

Show all results...

Background Check

Public Records

June E Heard

(712) 732-****

***** Highway St, Storm Lake, IA

View full report

June J Heard

A*****@gmail.com — (909) 586-****

***** N Live Oak Ave, Rialto, CA

View full report

June J Heard

H*****@aol.com — (940) 872-****

PO Box *****, Bowie, TX

View full report

June L Heard

S*****@hotmail.com — (678) 523-****

***** Falls Brooke Dr, Conyers, GA

View full report

June J Heard

D*****@aol.com — (662) 489-****

***** Highway 346, Pontotoc, MS

View full report

June W Heard

F*****@yahoo.com — (412) 371-****

***** Negley Run Blvd, Apt 416, Pittsburgh, PA

June J Heard

J*****@gmail.com — (229) 246-****

***** Spring Creek Rd, Bainbridge, GA

June O Heard

G*****@gmail.com — (786) 942-****

***** Paris Ct, Stephens City, VA

June J Heard

H*****@yahoo.com — (773) 986-****

***** N Karlov Ave, # 1, Chicago, IL

Show all results...

Phone Numbers

No Results

Email Addresses

juneh****@gmail.com

Search secret profiles for juneh****@gmail.com

juneh****@yahoo.com

Search secret profiles for juneh****@yahoo.com

Public Records

June Heard

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Search for contact info, city & state history, relatives, jobs, education & more

Search public records

Relatives

Facebook

June Heard

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Unlock Results

June Heard

Amelie June Hart

Show all results...

TikTok

June Heard - @june.heard

54 followers

June Heard - @juneheard80

62 followers

June - @juneheard

671 followers

June Bucko - @june.heard0

14 followers

June Isabella - @juneheard2

197 followers

juneheard330 - @juneheard330

45 followers

juneheard1 - @juneheard1

23 followers

michellejuneheard - @michellejuneheard

How To Make Money From Home - @dijjuneaheard

🚨This Is My Only BackupAccount🚨
📲How To Make Money From Home 🏡
START HERE↙️
1,850 followers

How To Make Money From Home 🏠 - @_dijuneaheard

🚨This Is My Only Account 🚨
How To Make Money From Home 🏠
START HERE
94 followers

Make 💰from 🏡✨ 2hrs/day - @dljuneaheard

Hi 👋 fans this is still my account i use this to reply comments
1 follower

How To Make Money From Home 🏡 - @dijunea.heard

🚨This is My Only Account🚨
📲 How to Make money From Home 🏡
START HERE ↙️
162 followers

How To Make Money From Home 🏡 - @.dijuneaheard

📲Earn From Home With Your Phone🏠
Start Here↙️
746 followers

How To Make Money From... - @dijuneaheard6

🚨This Is My Only Account G🚨
📲How To Make Money From Home🏠
START HERE↙️
3,089 followers

Show all results...

Youtube

June Heard - @juneheard6998

Usernames

whatislegitimateexpectationobv

Hayden Warszewski

Greater Melbourne Area

QQQ
Education: Mentone Grammar

Alumni

June (Jackson) Heard

Morgan Park High School (1979 - 1983)

Chicago, IL

June Heard

Stephen F. Austin High School (1976 - 1980)

Austin, TX

June Heard

Austin High School (1976 - 1980)

Chicago, IL

June Heard

Cedartown High School (1970 - 1974)

Cedartown, GA

June (Kennedy) Heard

Destrehan High School (1969 - 1973)

Destrehan, LA

June (Heard) Mullins

Pearl-Cohn High School (1968 - 1972)

Nashville, TN

June (Heard) Johnson

John Muir High School (1956 - 1958)

Pasadena, CA

Show all results...

City & State History

June Heard

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Search for June Heard's city and state history

Search address history

Nonprofits

Contributions

Athletes

No Results

Obituary

June Freeland Heard

Tillmans Corner, AL

Died: August 10, 2017 (aged 91)
Born: June 26, 1926

June Elaine Jepson Heard

Storm Lake, IA

Died: December 30, 2003 (aged 78)
Born: June 21, 1925

June Scheffler Heard

Sewickley, PA

Died: November 16, 1984 (aged 79)
Born: June 6, 1905

June Christner Heard

Scottdale, PA

Died: 1931

Wikipedia

No Results

News

Heard Around Campus — June 2025

Drexel - Wed, 25 Jun 2025

Bennie Anthony Heard Obituary March 21, 2025

Lord & Stephens Funeral Homes - Fri, 21 Mar 2025

Jared Heard Obituary Covington, LA

Dignity Memorial - Sun, 20 Jun 2021

Country artist Sandee June’s "Whiskey Us Away” climbs the Texas country music charts

The Courier of Montgomery County - Thu, 28 Sep 2023

Delayed repairs to 'pinch-point' bridge on A65 now due in June

Craven Herald - Fri, 14 Mar 2025

Law TikTokers’ Theory of Amber Heard Juror Identity Goes Viral

Newsweek - Mon, 11 Jul 2022

Story Behind the Song: Runaway June, ‘We Were Rich’

The Boot - Wed, 14 Aug 2019

Amber Heard claims text messages to father are evidence of physical abuse from Johnny Depp

The Independent - Sat, 18 Jun 2022

Heard Around Campus — June

Drexel - Wed, 29 Jun 2022

Would-be Jailbird Martin County Commissioner Sarah Heard’s Fate Going To Voters Before Jurors

The Capitolist - Tue, 28 Aug 2018

Where Amber Heard Is Today, 2 Years After Johnny Depp Defamation Trial

Us Weekly - Wed, 15 May 2024

Review: 'The Handmaid's Tale' season 2 episode 11 'Holly'

Entertainment.ie - Fri, 30 Apr 2021

Man accused of fatal stabbing appears in court

IndyStar - Wed, 30 Nov 2016

Elon Musk had been trying to meet Amber Heard for years

Page Six - Wed, 24 Aug 2016

Amber Heard appeals ruling that she defamed ex-husband Johnny Depp

Interaksyon - Fri, 22 Jul 2022

Amber Heard went from crying to 'ice cold in two seconds' at libel trial, juror says

Sky News - Fri, 17 Jun 2022

Amber Heard’s Jury Fraud Claims Quickly Dismissed By Judge

Newsweek - Wed, 13 Jul 2022

Jack Hopper Obituary Knoxville, TN

Dignity Memorial - Thu, 03 May 2018

US judge rejects Amber Heard's demand for new trial in Johnny Depp defamation case

The Straits Times - Thu, 14 Jul 2022

How Goodbye June’s Grief Led Them To The Rebellious Spirit Of Rock

UPROXX - Thu, 20 Jul 2017

Amber Heard says she and Johnny Depp were 'awful to each other' but that she 'always told the truth', in first interview since actor's libel case win

Sky News - Tue, 14 Jun 2022

Monthly Review: June 2024

Supreme Court Observer - Fri, 05 Jul 2024

Celebs: Judge rejects Amber Heard bid for new trial with Johnny Depp

Gulf Daily News - Thu, 14 Jul 2022

Germany calling: the shock jock of the war years

The Law Society of Ireland - Thu, 17 Jun 2021

Tourist plummeted to death falling over low wall at Magaluf apartment complex

Wales Online - Thu, 07 Nov 2019

Gateshead GP suspended for fake drug prescriptions

BBC - Mon, 28 Jun 2021

The Major Changes Johnny Depp Is Reportedly Making In Wake Of Amber Heard Trial

Nicki Swift - Mon, 26 Sep 2022

Johnny Depp avoids celebrating latest victory against Amber Heard

Geo.tv - Fri, 15 Jul 2022

Show all results...

Flickr

Sharon june Heard - @sheard492hotmail

0 photos - 3 followers

Sharon june Heard - @sheard622

0 photos - 1 follower

Sharon june Heard - @heard.s31

0 photos - 0 followers

June Heard - @junebucko714

3 followers

June Heard - @juneheard0087

0 followers

June Heard - @diamond00_03

0 followers

June Heard - @razaindia04

0 followers

June Heard - @june9569

0 followers

"What is legitimate expectation? Obviously, it is not a legal right. It is an expectation of a benefit, relief or remedy that may ordinarily flow from a promise or established practice. The term 'established practice' refers to a regular, consistent predictable and certain conduct, process or activity of the decision-making authority. The expectation should be legitimate, that is, reasonable, logical and valid. Any expectation which is based on sporadic or casual or random acts, or which is unreasonable, illogical or invalid cannot be a legitimate expectation. Not being a right, it is not enforceable as such. It is a concept fashioned by courts, for judicial review of administrative action. It is procedural in character based on the requirement of a higher degree of fairness in administrative action, as a consequence of the promise made, or practice established." [2006 (8) SCJ 721] In order to maintain the balance between the continuously evolving freedom of individuals and state authority, the Administrative law has to also evolve itself to suit the needs and expectations of people and their rights and duties. There are several principles of Administrative Law, which have been evolved by the courts for the purpose of controlling the exercise of power so that it does not lead to arbitrariness or abuse of power. These principles are intended to provide safeguard to the citizens against abuse or misuse of power by the instrumentalities or agencies of the State. One of the latest and important of these principles is the 'doctrine of legitimate expectation', which is an outcome of synthesis between the principle of administrative fairness (a component of the principles of natural justice) and the rule of estoppel1. Legitimate Expectations, are different from Expectations at large, and are not Legal rights, but are expectation of benefits, relief/remedy that accrues from a promise or established practices, and give rise to locus standi to a person to seek judicial review of any action, of State or its subsidiaries, which are arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair, malicious in law, devoid of Rule of law and violative of the principles of Natural Justice2. Origin The evolvement of the doctrine of Legitimate Expectation in the Common law jurisdiction can been traced to an obiter dictum of Lord Denning M. R in Sehmidt v. Secretary of Home Affairs3. Lord Denning observed in Sehmidt: "The speeches in Ridge v Baldwin show that an administrative body may, in a proper case, be bound to give a person who is affected by their decision an opportunity of making representations. It all depends on whether he has some right or interest or I would add, some legitimate expectation, of which it would not be fair to deprive him without hearing what he has to say ...." In this case certain non national students at Hubbard College of Scientology had been given leave to enter the United Kingdom before July, 1968, initially for a period of a month. The periods had been extended to the end of August and September 1968, respectively. Applications were made on behalf of the plaintiffs to the Home Office on June 11 and July 15, 1968 for extensions of their stay until November and December 1968, to complete their studies. By letters of July 29 and 30 the Home Secretary, the defendant, rejected the applications. The plaintiff's stay was, however, extended to September 30 to let them make arrangements to leave. The Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and 50 other alien students of the college, claimed declarations against the defendant that his decision not to consider further similar applications for extension of stay was unlawful, void, and of no effect and the defendant was bound to consider such applications on their merit and in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The court of appeal held that they had no legitimate expectation of extension and therefore no right to hearing, though revocation of their permits within the earlier granted period of permit would have been contrary to legitimate expectation. The legitimate expectation referred to in, this case did not give the alien students an enforceable right to stay for the time originally permitted but an enforceable right to be heard before the decision to revoke his permit was taken: a procedural protection only4. Evolution in India As already stated that the Doctrine of "Legitimate Expectation " is not a legal right in itself embedded in some statute of Code readily available for its inference and applicability. However it is a right to be treated fairly and the same has been fashioned by judicial precedents of various courts over a period time and is still in its evolving stage. The Supreme Court in M/S Sethi Auto Service Station vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors5. has examined the concept of 'legitimate expectation'. While dealing with the question of allotment of a plot by the DDA, the Supreme Court has enumerated various decisions of the concept of Legitimate Expectation and examined the law relating thereto. The Court held as under; "19. The protection of legitimate expectations, as pointed out in De Smith's Judicial Review (Sixth Edition) (para 12-001), is at the root of the constitutional principle of the rule of law, which requires regularity, predictability, and certainty in government's dealings with the public. The doctrine of legitimate expectation and its impact in the administrative law has been considered by this Court in a catena of decisions but for the sake of brevity we do not propose to refer to all these cases. Nevertheless, in order to appreciate the concept, we shall refer to a few decisions. At this juncture, we deem it necessary to refer to a decision by the House of Lords in Council of Civil Service Unions & Ors. Vs. Minister for the Civil Service, a locus classicus on the subject, wherein for the first time an attempt was made to give a comprehensive definition to the principle of legitimate expectation. Enunciating the basic principles relating to legitimate expectation, Lord Diplock observed that for a legitimate expectation to arise, the decision of the administrative authority must affect such person either (a) by altering rights or obligations of that person which are enforceable by or against him in private law or; (b) by depriving him of some benefit or advantage which either: (i) he has in the past been permitted by the decision maker to enjoy and which he can legitimately expect to be permitted to continue to do until some rational ground for withdrawing it has been communicated to him and he has been given an opportunity to comment thereon or (ii) he has received assurance from the decisionmaker that they will not be withdrawn without first giving him an opportunity of advancing reasons for contending that they should be withdrawn. 20. In Attorney General of Hong Kong Vs. Ng Yuen Shiu, a leading case on the subject, Lord Fraser said: "when a public authority has promised to follow a certain procedure, it is in the interest of good administration that it should act fairly and should implement its promise, so long as the implementation does not interfere with in its statutory duty". 21. Explaining the nature and scope of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in Food Corporation of India Vs. M/s Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, a three-Judge Bench of this Court had observed thus: "The mere reasonable or legitimate expectation of a citizen, in such a situation, may not by itself be a distinct enforceable right, but failure to consider and give due weight to it may render the decision arbitrary, and this is how the requirement of due consideration of a legitimate expectation forms part of the principle of non-arbitrariness, a necessary concomitant of the rule of law. Every legitimate expectation is a relevant factor requiring due consideration in a fair decision-making process. Whether the expectation of the claimant is reasonable or legitimate in the context is a question of fact in each case. Whenever the question arises, it is to be determined not according to the claimant's perception but in larger public interest wherein other more important considerations may outweigh what would otherwise have been the legitimate expectation of the claimant. A bona fide decision of the public authority reached in this manner would satisfy the requirement of nonarbitrariness and withstand judicial scrutiny. The doctrine of legitimate expectation gets assimilated in the rule of law and operates in our legal system in this manner and to this extent." 22. The concept of legitimate expectation again came up for consideration in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Hindustan Development Corporation & Ors. Referring to a large number of foreign and Indian decisions, including in Council of Civil Service Unions and Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries (supra) and elaborately explaining the concept of legitimate expectation, it was observed as under: "If a denial of legitimate expectation in a given case amounts to denial of right guaranteed or is arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair or biased, gross abuse of power or violation of principles of natural justice, the same can be questioned on the well-known grounds attracting Article 14 but a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It can be one of the grounds to consider but the court must lift the veil and see whether the decision is violative of these principles warranting interference. It depends very much on the facts and the recognized general principles of administrative law applicable to such facts and the concept of legitimate expectation which is the latest recruit to a long list of concepts fashioned by the courts for the review of administrative action, must be restricted to the general legal limitations applicable and binding the manner of the future exercise of administrative power in a particular case. It follows that the concept of legitimate expectation is "not the key which unlocks the treasury of natural justice and it ought not unlock the gate which shuts the court out of review on the merits", particularly when the element of speculation and uncertainty is inherent in that very concept." 23. Taking note of the observations of the Australian High Court in Attorney General for New South Wales Vs. Quinn that, "to strike down the exercise of administrative power solely on the ground of avoiding the disappointment of the legitimate expectations of an individual would be to set the Courts adrift on a featureless sea of pragmatism", speaking for the Bench, K. Jayachandra Reddy, J. said that there are stronger reasons as to why the legitimate expectation should not be substantively protected than the reasons as to why it should be protected. The caution sounded in the said Australian case that the Courts should restrain themselves and restrict such claims duly to the legal limitations was also endorsed. 24. Then again in National Buildings Construction Corporation Vs. S. Raghunathan & Ors., a three-Judge Bench of this Court observed as under: "The doctrine of "legitimate expectation" has its genesis in the field of administrative law. The Government and its departments, in administering the affairs of the country, are expected to honour their statements of policy or intention and treat the citizens with full personal consideration without any iota of abuse of discretion. The policy statements cannot be disregarded unfairly or applied selectively. Unfairness in the form of unreasonableness is akin to violation of natural justice. It was in this context that the doctrine of "legitimate expectation" was evolved which today has become a source of substantive as well as procedural rights. But claims based on "legitimate expectation" have been held to require reliance on representations and resulting detriment to the claimant in the same way as claims based on promissory estoppel." 25. This Court in Punjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors., referring to a large number of authorities on the question, observed that a change in policy can defeat a substantive legitimate expectation if it can be justified on "Wednesbury" reasonableness. The decision maker has the choice in the balancing of the pros and cons relevant to the change in policy. Therefore, the choice of the policy is for the decision maker and not for the Court. The legitimate substantive expectation, merely permits the Court to find out if the change in policy which is the cause for defeating the legitimate expectation is irrational or perverse or one which no reasonable person could have made. (Also see: Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer & Ors. 26. Very recently in Jitendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. It has been reiterated that a legitimate expectation is not the same thing as anticipation. It is distinct and different from a desire and hope. It is based on a right. It is grounded in the rule of law as requiring regularity, predictability and certainty in the Government's dealings with the public and the doctrine of legitimate expectation operates both in procedural and substantive matters. An examination of the afore-noted few decisions shows that the golden thread running through all these decisions is that a case for applicability of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, now accepted in the subjective sense as part of our legal jurisprudence, arises when an administrative body by reason of a representation or by past practice or conduct aroused an expectation which it would be within its powers to fulfill unless some overriding public interest comes in the way. However, a person who bases his claim on the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in the first instance, has to satisfy that he has relied on the said representation and the denial of that expectation has worked to his detriment. The Court could interfere only if the decision taken by the authority was found to be arbitrary, unreasonable or in gross abuse of power or in violation of principles of natural justice and not taken in public interest. But a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It is well settled that the concept of legitimate expectation has no role to play where the State action is as a public policy or in the public interest unless the action taken amounts to an abuse of power. The court must not usurp the discretion of the public authority which is empowered to take the decisions under law and the court is expected to apply an objective standard which leaves to the deciding authority the full range of choice which the legislature is presumed to have intended. Even in a case where the decision is left entirely to the discretion of the deciding authority without any such legal bounds and if the decision is taken fairly and objectively, the court will not interfere on the ground of procedural fairness to a person whose interest based on legitimate expectation might be affected. Therefore, a legitimate expectation can at the most be one of the grounds which may give rise to judicial review but the granting of relief is very much limited. - @whatislegitimateexpectationobv

2,120 followers

June B Heard - @brandonvibe1

0 followers

june heard - @june_heard

0 followers

June Heard - @juneheard

0 followers

Sharon June Heard - @sharonjuneheard

0 followers

June Heard - @juneheard539

0 followers

Juneheard - @juneheard6

0 followers

Juneheard - @juneheard5059

0 followers

juneheard - @msjuneheard62

0 followers

Juneheard - @juneheard4442

0 followers

Show all results...

Quora

June Heard

June B Heard

Sharon June Heard

Sharon. June Heard

Show all results...

Poshmark

June Heard - @juneheard

Web results

June Heard - Address & Phone Number | Whitepages People …

View June Heard results including current phone number, address, relatives, background check report, and property record with Whitepages.

June Heard Obituary 2017 - Mobile Memorial Gardens Funeral …

June Freeland Heard, a native of Mobile, Alabama, and resident of Roswell, Georgia, passed away at 9:00 on August 10, 2017 at the age of 91. She taught in the Mobile …

June Heard Obituary (2013) - Butler, PA - Legacy.com

June was born on June 27, 1935 and passed away on Sunday, February 3, 2013. June was a resident of Butler, Pennsylvania. To plant trees in memory, please visit the Sympathy Store. …

Search June Heard Obituaries and Funeral Services - Legacy.com

Search all June Heard Obituaries and Death Notices to find upcoming funeral home services, leave condolences for the family, and research genealogy.

June Heard Obituary and Online Memorial (2013) - Legacy.com

June Heard Obituary and Online Memorial (2013). Share your favorite memories June and celebrate their life with the Heard family on their online obituary.

June Heard in IL - Illinois Address & Phone Number - Whitepages

Find June's current address in Illinois, phone number and email. Contact information for people named June Heard found in IL, and include family, property and public records.

June Heard Obituary and Online Memorial (2017) - Legacy.com

June Heard Obituary Published by Legacy Remembers from Aug. 10 to Aug. 13, 2017. June Freeland Heard, a native of Mobile, Alabama, and resident of Roswell, Georgia, passed away …

June Heard (50 matches): Phone Number, Email, Address - Spokeo

Find June Heard’s phone number, address, and email on Spokeo, the leading online directory for contact information.

June Freeland Heard, 98 - Roswell, GA - Reputation & Contact …

View FREE Public Profile & Reputation for June Heard in Roswell, GA - Court Records | Photos | Address, Emails & Phone | Reviews | Net Worth

June D Heard, 62 - Chicago, IL - Reputation & Contact Details

View FREE Public Profile & Reputation for June Heard in Chicago, IL - Court Records | Photos | Address, Emails & Phone | Reviews | Net Worth

June Heard Obituary - Death Notice and Service Information

June Heard passed away on June 20, 2023 in Lagrange, Georgia. Funeral Home Services for June are being provided by Higgins Funeral Home at Hunter-Allen-Myhand.

June K Heard, 69 - Madisonville, LA - Reputation & Contact Details

View FREE Public Profile & Reputation for June Heard in Madisonville, LA - Court Records | Photos | Address, Emails & Phone | Reviews | $100 - $149,999 Net Worth

June R Heard, 64 - Jayess, MS - Reputation & Contact Details

View FREE Public Profile & Reputation for June Heard in Jayess, MS - Court Records | Photos | Address, Email & Phone | Reviews | $70 - $79,999 Net Worth

Show all results...

June Heard

Instagram

Twitter

Background Check

Background Check

Public Records

June W Heard

June J Heard

June O Heard

June J Heard

Phone Numbers

Email Addresses

Public Records

Relatives

Facebook

TikTok

Youtube

Usernames

LinkedIn

Alumni

June (Jackson) Heard

June Heard

June Heard

June Heard

June (Kennedy) Heard

June (Heard) Mullins

June (Heard) Johnson

City & State History

Nonprofits

Contributions

Athletes

Obituary

Wikipedia

News

Flickr

Pinterest

Quora