June Quinn

Found 113 people in New York, Georgia, Florida and other states

Sponsored by SpokeoPaid Service

June Q Quinn

J*****@gmail.com — (316) 550-****

***** N Commanche Ct, Kechi, KS

View full report

June J Quinn

(303) 427-****

***** Zenobia St, Unit 2, Westminster, CO

View full report

June J Quinn

G*****@gmail.com — (860) 867-****

***** Cross Rd, Waterford, CT

View full report

June G Quinn

N*****@gmail.com — (636) 379-****

***** The Cedars Dr, O Fallon, MO

View full report

June P Quinn

K*****@gmail.com — (718) 974-****

***** Burke Ave, Staten Island, NY

View full report

June A Quinn

D*****@gmail.com — (479) 252-****

***** Cherry St, Mena, AR

June M Quinn

B*****@yahoo.com — (708) 439-****

***** Orchard St, Blue Island, IL

June R Quinn

J*****@gmail.com — (706) 563-****

***** Mcpherson Dr, Columbus, GA

June J Quinn

J*****@yahoo.com — (317) 831-****

***** Lori Ln, Bedford, IN

Show all results...

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

(260) 673-****

June M Quinn, Roanoke, IN

Search details

(202) 316-****

June E Quinn, Brentwood, MD

Search details

(910) 425-****

June L Quinn, Raleigh, NC

Search details

(337) 583-****

June P Quinn, Yoakum, TX

Search details

(774) 923-****

June A Quinn, Alpharetta, GA

Search details

(704) 455-****

June E Quinn, Harrisburg, NC

Show all results...

Sponsored by SpokeoPaid Service

juneq****@gmail.com

Search secret profiles for juneq****@gmail.com

Search

juneq****@yahoo.com

Search secret profiles for juneq****@yahoo.com

Search

June Quinn

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Search for contact info, city & state history, relatives, jobs, education & more

Search public records
junequinn
junequinn2
junequinn7
quinnjune
june_quinn
quinn_june
szentkutiquinn
junebug3745
junequinn0
june__quinn_
june4quinn
junequinn4913
june.quinn.7731
june_official_1
junebrianquinn
junequinnpoetry
junequinn7731
junequinn_
pieceofcake62
junequinn3
daughter_of_the_king_97
juney_baloney
ftoma.alshibani
grannyjune1226
junequinn78
junequinn01
june.quinn.10
quinnseddon
kerryjuneq
june_quinn__78946
ilovegod3745
june.quinn.t626
junequinn47
june.quinn.m
junequinn91
j_u_n_e_quinn
j_u_n_e_quinn_
jnqnn
bts_mf_trash
junehoodxx
junequi25857831
junequi72453432
mjszentkuti
emaung
wilrayzkain
junequi03371006
quinn89229
junequi22108457
quinn31445
quinnjune97533
quinn41349
quinnjune40723
lexiibaee22
jquinn3745
june.quinn.739
june.quinn.399
june.quinn.9
june.quinn
junequinn99
junequinn420
junequinn21
junequinn1987
junequinn1722
junequinn2006
user4616815345418
junequinn16
junequinn926
junequinn1673
junequinn5
junequinn10
junequinn8
junequinnn
quinn_june_
quinniejune
junequinnbx
junequinn9541
btrgirly1
junequinn548
hailey2210
juneoquinn
lifewithquinnandjune4166
jdquinn1
quinnies2
junieq2012
juneq
junipercupiter
jellen57bug
jrquinn158
junemaw
junequinn52
junequinn1
bananajuneq
jquinn1198
juneqpowell48
jquinn0072
juneq4603
harrystylesgree
junehquinn1997
jquinn0527
leonyfernandezdeinert
whatislegitimateexpectationobv
konstantinw0ig
unicornjune1997
juniperlove97
junequinn8552
jmquinn0546
junequinn550
juneq49
jquinn5983
junequinn12
juq7
junequinn1935
junebugjune97
junequinn62
jquinn0031
meya123ao
junequinn1948virginmediacom
juneandfrank
maryjunequinn
alexanderquinn1997
aquamarine1997
junequinn160
junequinn1948
junequinn9365
junequinn1932
medinaquinnjune
jquinn6762
lavendermermaid
Show all results...
June Quinn - LinkedIn

June Quinn

Richmond

--
Experience: GPM Investments, LLC
Education: North Georgia Technical College

June Quinn - LinkedIn

June Quinn

Evergreen, CO

Business Customer Care Representative at ...

June Quinn - LinkedIn

June Quinn

Dedicated Administrator with seasoned expertise ...

June Quinn - LinkedIn

June Quinn

30531

Jimmy John's

June Quinn - LinkedIn

June Quinn

3805

--
Experience: The Palestine Chronicle

June Quinn - LinkedIn

June Quinn

Student at Alliance University

June Quinn - LinkedIn

June Quinn

Luton

Member IMDT
Experience: Lady Dog Whisperer
Education: CIDBT

June Quinn - LinkedIn

June Quinn

Saskatoon

Rn at City hospital Saskatoon canada

Mary-June Quinn - LinkedIn

Mary-June Quinn

San Angelo, TX

Student at Angelo State University

June Quinn - LinkedIn

June Quinn

M30 0AA

Registered Nurse at Nhs

June Quinn - LinkedIn

June Quinn

LN6 0AA

Retired at Lady Dog Whisperer

Chichi Nzekwube - LinkedIn

Chichi Nzekwube

Hillingdon

Cleaner at CAPIL LIMITED

Gabi Gogan - LinkedIn

Gabi Gogan

Creative-business Coach and Mentor for Artists

Azizi Jones - LinkedIn

Azizi Jones

Colorado Springs 

Colorado Springs Marriott

Mychael James-Dixon - LinkedIn

Mychael James-Dixon

--

sandy foster - LinkedIn

sandy foster

Local
Mfuh Cuba Faruk - LinkedIn

Mfuh Cuba Faruk

Scrum Master / Agile Consultant

Heidi Heath - LinkedIn

Heidi Heath

Frankston

Kingston City Council
Education: Holmesglen

Show all results...

June Quinn

  • Davis School Of Independent Study (1996 - 2000)

    Davis, CA

June (Quinn) Tew

  • Seventy-First High School (1984 - 1988)

    Fayetteville, NC

June (Quinn) Kyger

  • Woodlan High School (1979 - 1983)

    Woodburn, IN

June Quinn

  • Bristol High School (1976 - 1980)

    Bristol, RI

June (Queen) Quinn

  • Howell High School (1971 - 1975)

    Farmingdale, NJ

June Quinn

  • Bristol High School (1970 - 1974)

    Bristol, RI

June (Oliver) Quinn

  • Kearny High School (1967 - 1969)

    San Diego, CA

June (Quinn) Hull

  • Gaffney High School (1964 - 1968)

    Gaffney, SC

June (Thomas) Quinn

  • Holy Family School (1963 - 1967)

    Carteret, NJ

June Ann (Manuszak) Quinn

  • Frankford High School (1961 - 1965)

    Philadelphia, PA

June (Richards) Quinn

  • Commerce High School (1959 - 1963)

    Springfield, MA

June (Quinn) Cagle

  • McClatchy High School (1956 - 1960)

    Sacramento, CA

June (Quinn) Lalonde

  • Utica High School (1954 - 1958)

    Utica, MI

June Quinn

  • Ft. Recovery High School (1953 - 1957)

    Ft. Recovery, OH

June (Mills) Quinn

  • French Lick High School (1945 - 1949)

    French Lick, IN

June (Foster) Quinn

  • Merchantville High School (1945 - 1949)

    Merchantville, NJ

June (Lancy) Quinn

  • Quincy High School (1940 - 1944)

    Quincy, MA

June (Quinn) Marshall

  • Fremont High School (1939 - 1943)

    Oakland, CA

Show all results...

June Quinn

Sponsored by PeopleLookerPaid Service

Search for June Quinn's city and state history

Search address history
June Marilyn Wood Quinn - Obituary

June Marilyn Wood Quinn

Hardwick, VT

Died: February 17, 2021 (aged 88)
Born: November 17, 1932

June Quinn

Chattanooga, TN

Died: June 29, 2020

June Mills Quinn - Obituary

June Mills Quinn

Bedford, IN

Died: May 12, 2019 (aged 87)
Born: June 12, 1931

June Norman Quinn Saunders - Obituary

June Norman Quinn Saunders

Zanesville, OH

Died: May 14, 2017 (aged 91)
Born: July 9, 1925

June Kathryn Van Tuyl Quinn - Obituary

June Kathryn Van Tuyl Quinn

Columbus, MS

Died: July 17, 2014 (aged 90)
Born: June 1, 1924

June Adele Herling Quinn - Obituary

June Adele Herling Quinn

Monona, WI

Died: November 15, 2012 (aged 85)
Born: October 8, 1927

June Marie Hughes Quinn - Obituary

June Marie Hughes Quinn

Mendon, MI

Died: March 15, 2010 (aged 83)
Born: June 2, 1926

June L Quinn - Obituary

June L Quinn

Leavenworth, KS

Died: December 30, 2007 (aged 75)
Born: September 12, 1932

June Ann Quinn

Calverton, NY

Died: February 22, 2007 (aged 73)
Born: June 24, 1933

June Barnes Quinn - Obituary

June Barnes Quinn

Attalla, AL

Died: January 16, 2007 (aged 63)
Born: January 2, 1944

June Marguerite Hartmann Quinn - Obituary

June Marguerite Hartmann Quinn

Arlington Heights, IL

Died: November 13, 2006 (aged 77)
Born: August 17, 1929

June Quinn

Died: March 2006

June E. Elwell Quinn - Obituary

June E. Elwell Quinn

Timonium, MD

Died: November 7, 2004 (aged 87)
Born: June 4, 1917

Show all results...

Websites owned by June Quinn

powhillonfarm.co.uk

Registered on August 11, 2002

dogbehaviouraltraining.co.uk

Registered on March 30, 2015

powhillon.co.uk

Registered on March 6, 2016

NHL Draft Prospect Quinn Commits To Northeastern

The Hockey News - Thu, 20 Mar 2025

Obituary | Mindy June Quinn

schellhaas funeral home & cremation services - Wed, 03 Mar 2021

Betty ""June"" Quinn Obituary September 15, 2016

Horan & McConaty Funeral Service and Cremation - Thu, 15 Sep 2016

June D. (Helmuth) Quinn Obituary December 10, 2015

Tighe Hamilton Regional Funeral Home - Thu, 10 Dec 2015

Mary Quinn Obituary Cary, NC

Dignity Memorial - Wed, 09 Dec 2020

June Quinn

The Commercial Dispatch - Sun, 20 Jul 2014

The Mighty Quinn – a timeline of Balfour Beatty’s turnaround

Construction News - Wed, 05 Mar 2025

June Smith Obituary (1941 2024) Edinburgh, City of Edinburgh Edinburgh News

Legacy | Obituary - Mon, 23 Dec 2024

Julia Quinn defends major Bridgerton book change following fan backlash

Cosmopolitan - Tue, 25 Jun 2024

3-year-old known as 'Mighty Quinn' goes trick-or-treating after 100 days of isolation due to cancer treatment

ABC News - Thu, 31 Oct 2019

Exclusive | Colin Quinn marries ‘Late Night’ producer Jen Sochko

Page Six - Mon, 10 Jun 2019

Quinn Emanuel Adjusts Partner Compensation Due To Pandemic

Above the Law - Mon, 11 May 2020

Death Notice June QUINN

Funeral Times - Sat, 22 Jun 2024

Glenn Quinn Obituary Rockledge, FL

Dignity Memorial - Mon, 02 Apr 2018

Show all results...
June Quinn Kyger - @juneq - Pinterest

June Quinn Kyger - @juneq

112 followers

June Quinn - @junipercupiter - Pinterest

June Quinn - @junipercupiter

0 followers

June Quinn - @jellen57bug - Pinterest

June Quinn - @jellen57bug

0 followers

June Quinn - @jrquinn158 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @jrquinn158

0 followers

June Quinn - @junequinn2 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @junequinn2

0 followers

June Maw Quinn - @junemaw - Pinterest

June Maw Quinn - @junemaw

0 followers

june quinn - @junequinn0 - Pinterest

june quinn - @junequinn0

0 followers

June Quinn - @junequinn52 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @junequinn52

10 followers

June Quinn - @junequinn1 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @junequinn1

18 followers

June Quinn - @bananajuneq - Pinterest

June Quinn - @bananajuneq

1 follower

June Quinn - @jquinn1198 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @jquinn1198

0 followers

June Quinn - @juneqpowell48 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @juneqpowell48

0 followers

June Quinn - @jquinn0072 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @jquinn0072

0 followers

June Quinn - @juneq4603 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @juneq4603

0 followers

June Quinn - @harrystylesgree - Pinterest

June Quinn - @harrystylesgree

1 follower

June Quinn - @junehquinn1997 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @junehquinn1997

0 followers

june quinn - @jquinn0527 - Pinterest

june quinn - @jquinn0527

0 followers

June Quinn - @leonyfernandezdeinert - Pinterest

June Quinn - @leonyfernandezdeinert

0 followers

"What is legitimate expectation? Obviously, it is not a legal right. It is an expectation of a benefit, relief or remedy that may ordinarily flow from a promise or established practice. The term 'established practice' refers to a regular, consistent predictable and certain conduct, process or activity of the decision-making authority. The expectation should be legitimate, that is, reasonable, logical and valid. Any expectation which is based on sporadic or casual or random acts, or which is unreasonable, illogical or invalid cannot be a legitimate expectation. Not being a right, it is not enforceable as such. It is a concept fashioned by courts, for judicial review of administrative action. It is procedural in character based on the requirement of a higher degree of fairness in administrative action, as a consequence of the promise made, or practice established." [2006 (8) SCJ 721] In order to maintain the balance between the continuously evolving freedom of individuals and state authority, the Administrative law has to also evolve itself to suit the needs and expectations of people and their rights and duties. There are several principles of Administrative Law, which have been evolved by the courts for the purpose of controlling the exercise of power so that it does not lead to arbitrariness or abuse of power. These principles are intended to provide safeguard to the citizens against abuse or misuse of power by the instrumentalities or agencies of the State. One of the latest and important of these principles is the 'doctrine of legitimate expectation', which is an outcome of synthesis between the principle of administrative fairness (a component of the principles of natural justice) and the rule of estoppel1. Legitimate Expectations, are different from Expectations at large, and are not Legal rights, but are expectation of benefits, relief/remedy that accrues from a promise or established practices, and give rise to locus standi to a person to seek judicial review of any action, of State or its subsidiaries, which are arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair, malicious in law, devoid of Rule of law and violative of the principles of Natural Justice2. Origin The evolvement of the doctrine of Legitimate Expectation in the Common law jurisdiction can been traced to an obiter dictum of Lord Denning M. R in Sehmidt v. Secretary of Home Affairs3. Lord Denning observed in Sehmidt: "The speeches in Ridge v Baldwin show that an administrative body may, in a proper case, be bound to give a person who is affected by their decision an opportunity of making representations. It all depends on whether he has some right or interest or I would add, some legitimate expectation, of which it would not be fair to deprive him without hearing what he has to say ...." In this case certain non national students at Hubbard College of Scientology had been given leave to enter the United Kingdom before July, 1968, initially for a period of a month. The periods had been extended to the end of August and September 1968, respectively. Applications were made on behalf of the plaintiffs to the Home Office on June 11 and July 15, 1968 for extensions of their stay until November and December 1968, to complete their studies. By letters of July 29 and 30 the Home Secretary, the defendant, rejected the applications. The plaintiff's stay was, however, extended to September 30 to let them make arrangements to leave. The Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and 50 other alien students of the college, claimed declarations against the defendant that his decision not to consider further similar applications for extension of stay was unlawful, void, and of no effect and the defendant was bound to consider such applications on their merit and in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The court of appeal held that they had no legitimate expectation of extension and therefore no right to hearing, though revocation of their permits within the earlier granted period of permit would have been contrary to legitimate expectation. The legitimate expectation referred to in, this case did not give the alien students an enforceable right to stay for the time originally permitted but an enforceable right to be heard before the decision to revoke his permit was taken: a procedural protection only4. Evolution in India As already stated that the Doctrine of "Legitimate Expectation " is not a legal right in itself embedded in some statute of Code readily available for its inference and applicability. However it is a right to be treated fairly and the same has been fashioned by judicial precedents of various courts over a period time and is still in its evolving stage. The Supreme Court in M/S Sethi Auto Service Station vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors5. has examined the concept of 'legitimate expectation'. While dealing with the question of allotment of a plot by the DDA, the Supreme Court has enumerated various decisions of the concept of Legitimate Expectation and examined the law relating thereto. The Court held as under; "19. The protection of legitimate expectations, as pointed out in De Smith's Judicial Review (Sixth Edition) (para 12-001), is at the root of the constitutional principle of the rule of law, which requires regularity, predictability, and certainty in government's dealings with the public. The doctrine of legitimate expectation and its impact in the administrative law has been considered by this Court in a catena of decisions but for the sake of brevity we do not propose to refer to all these cases. Nevertheless, in order to appreciate the concept, we shall refer to a few decisions. At this juncture, we deem it necessary to refer to a decision by the House of Lords in Council of Civil Service Unions & Ors. Vs. Minister for the Civil Service, a locus classicus on the subject, wherein for the first time an attempt was made to give a comprehensive definition to the principle of legitimate expectation. Enunciating the basic principles relating to legitimate expectation, Lord Diplock observed that for a legitimate expectation to arise, the decision of the administrative authority must affect such person either (a) by altering rights or obligations of that person which are enforceable by or against him in private law or; (b) by depriving him of some benefit or advantage which either: (i) he has in the past been permitted by the decision maker to enjoy and which he can legitimately expect to be permitted to continue to do until some rational ground for withdrawing it has been communicated to him and he has been given an opportunity to comment thereon or (ii) he has received assurance from the decisionmaker that they will not be withdrawn without first giving him an opportunity of advancing reasons for contending that they should be withdrawn. 20. In Attorney General of Hong Kong Vs. Ng Yuen Shiu, a leading case on the subject, Lord Fraser said: "when a public authority has promised to follow a certain procedure, it is in the interest of good administration that it should act fairly and should implement its promise, so long as the implementation does not interfere with in its statutory duty". 21. Explaining the nature and scope of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in Food Corporation of India Vs. M/s Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, a three-Judge Bench of this Court had observed thus: "The mere reasonable or legitimate expectation of a citizen, in such a situation, may not by itself be a distinct enforceable right, but failure to consider and give due weight to it may render the decision arbitrary, and this is how the requirement of due consideration of a legitimate expectation forms part of the principle of non-arbitrariness, a necessary concomitant of the rule of law. Every legitimate expectation is a relevant factor requiring due consideration in a fair decision-making process. Whether the expectation of the claimant is reasonable or legitimate in the context is a question of fact in each case. Whenever the question arises, it is to be determined not according to the claimant's perception but in larger public interest wherein other more important considerations may outweigh what would otherwise have been the legitimate expectation of the claimant. A bona fide decision of the public authority reached in this manner would satisfy the requirement of nonarbitrariness and withstand judicial scrutiny. The doctrine of legitimate expectation gets assimilated in the rule of law and operates in our legal system in this manner and to this extent." 22. The concept of legitimate expectation again came up for consideration in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Hindustan Development Corporation & Ors. Referring to a large number of foreign and Indian decisions, including in Council of Civil Service Unions and Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries (supra) and elaborately explaining the concept of legitimate expectation, it was observed as under: "If a denial of legitimate expectation in a given case amounts to denial of right guaranteed or is arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair or biased, gross abuse of power or violation of principles of natural justice, the same can be questioned on the well-known grounds attracting Article 14 but a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It can be one of the grounds to consider but the court must lift the veil and see whether the decision is violative of these principles warranting interference. It depends very much on the facts and the recognized general principles of administrative law applicable to such facts and the concept of legitimate expectation which is the latest recruit to a long list of concepts fashioned by the courts for the review of administrative action, must be restricted to the general legal limitations applicable and binding the manner of the future exercise of administrative power in a particular case. It follows that the concept of legitimate expectation is "not the key which unlocks the treasury of natural justice and it ought not unlock the gate which shuts the court out of review on the merits", particularly when the element of speculation and uncertainty is inherent in that very concept." 23. Taking note of the observations of the Australian High Court in Attorney General for New South Wales Vs. Quinn that, "to strike down the exercise of administrative power solely on the ground of avoiding the disappointment of the legitimate expectations of an individual would be to set the Courts adrift on a featureless sea of pragmatism", speaking for the Bench, K. Jayachandra Reddy, J. said that there are stronger reasons as to why the legitimate expectation should not be substantively protected than the reasons as to why it should be protected. The caution sounded in the said Australian case that the Courts should restrain themselves and restrict such claims duly to the legal limitations was also endorsed. 24. Then again in National Buildings Construction Corporation Vs. S. Raghunathan & Ors., a three-Judge Bench of this Court observed as under: "The doctrine of "legitimate expectation" has its genesis in the field of administrative law. The Government and its departments, in administering the affairs of the country, are expected to honour their statements of policy or intention and treat the citizens with full personal consideration without any iota of abuse of discretion. The policy statements cannot be disregarded unfairly or applied selectively. Unfairness in the form of unreasonableness is akin to violation of natural justice. It was in this context that the doctrine of "legitimate expectation" was evolved which today has become a source of substantive as well as procedural rights. But claims based on "legitimate expectation" have been held to require reliance on representations and resulting detriment to the claimant in the same way as claims based on promissory estoppel." 25. This Court in Punjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors., referring to a large number of authorities on the question, observed that a change in policy can defeat a substantive legitimate expectation if it can be justified on "Wednesbury" reasonableness. The decision maker has the choice in the balancing of the pros and cons relevant to the change in policy. Therefore, the choice of the policy is for the decision maker and not for the Court. The legitimate substantive expectation, merely permits the Court to find out if the change in policy which is the cause for defeating the legitimate expectation is irrational or perverse or one which no reasonable person could have made. (Also see: Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer & Ors. 26. Very recently in Jitendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. It has been reiterated that a legitimate expectation is not the same thing as anticipation. It is distinct and different from a desire and hope. It is based on a right. It is grounded in the rule of law as requiring regularity, predictability and certainty in the Government's dealings with the public and the doctrine of legitimate expectation operates both in procedural and substantive matters. An examination of the afore-noted few decisions shows that the golden thread running through all these decisions is that a case for applicability of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, now accepted in the subjective sense as part of our legal jurisprudence, arises when an administrative body by reason of a representation or by past practice or conduct aroused an expectation which it would be within its powers to fulfill unless some overriding public interest comes in the way. However, a person who bases his claim on the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in the first instance, has to satisfy that he has relied on the said representation and the denial of that expectation has worked to his detriment. The Court could interfere only if the decision taken by the authority was found to be arbitrary, unreasonable or in gross abuse of power or in violation of principles of natural justice and not taken in public interest. But a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It is well settled that the concept of legitimate expectation has no role to play where the State action is as a public policy or in the public interest unless the action taken amounts to an abuse of power. The court must not usurp the discretion of the public authority which is empowered to take the decisions under law and the court is expected to apply an objective standard which leaves to the deciding authority the full range of choice which the legislature is presumed to have intended. Even in a case where the decision is left entirely to the discretion of the deciding authority without any such legal bounds and if the decision is taken fairly and objectively, the court will not interfere on the ground of procedural fairness to a person whose interest based on legitimate expectation might be affected. Therefore, a legitimate expectation can at the most be one of the grounds which may give rise to judicial review but the granting of relief is very much limited. - @whatislegitimateexpectationobv - Pinterest

"What is legitimate expectation? Obviously, it is not a legal right. It is an expectation of a benefit, relief or remedy that may ordinarily flow from a promise or established practice. The term 'established practice' refers to a regular, consistent predictable and certain conduct, process or activity of the decision-making authority. The expectation should be legitimate, that is, reasonable, logical and valid. Any expectation which is based on sporadic or casual or random acts, or which is unreasonable, illogical or invalid cannot be a legitimate expectation. Not being a right, it is not enforceable as such. It is a concept fashioned by courts, for judicial review of administrative action. It is procedural in character based on the requirement of a higher degree of fairness in administrative action, as a consequence of the promise made, or practice established." [2006 (8) SCJ 721] In order to maintain the balance between the continuously evolving freedom of individuals and state authority, the Administrative law has to also evolve itself to suit the needs and expectations of people and their rights and duties. There are several principles of Administrative Law, which have been evolved by the courts for the purpose of controlling the exercise of power so that it does not lead to arbitrariness or abuse of power. These principles are intended to provide safeguard to the citizens against abuse or misuse of power by the instrumentalities or agencies of the State. One of the latest and important of these principles is the 'doctrine of legitimate expectation', which is an outcome of synthesis between the principle of administrative fairness (a component of the principles of natural justice) and the rule of estoppel1. Legitimate Expectations, are different from Expectations at large, and are not Legal rights, but are expectation of benefits, relief/remedy that accrues from a promise or established practices, and give rise to locus standi to a person to seek judicial review of any action, of State or its subsidiaries, which are arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair, malicious in law, devoid of Rule of law and violative of the principles of Natural Justice2. Origin The evolvement of the doctrine of Legitimate Expectation in the Common law jurisdiction can been traced to an obiter dictum of Lord Denning M. R in Sehmidt v. Secretary of Home Affairs3. Lord Denning observed in Sehmidt: "The speeches in Ridge v Baldwin show that an administrative body may, in a proper case, be bound to give a person who is affected by their decision an opportunity of making representations. It all depends on whether he has some right or interest or I would add, some legitimate expectation, of which it would not be fair to deprive him without hearing what he has to say ...." In this case certain non national students at Hubbard College of Scientology had been given leave to enter the United Kingdom before July, 1968, initially for a period of a month. The periods had been extended to the end of August and September 1968, respectively. Applications were made on behalf of the plaintiffs to the Home Office on June 11 and July 15, 1968 for extensions of their stay until November and December 1968, to complete their studies. By letters of July 29 and 30 the Home Secretary, the defendant, rejected the applications. The plaintiff's stay was, however, extended to September 30 to let them make arrangements to leave. The Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and 50 other alien students of the college, claimed declarations against the defendant that his decision not to consider further similar applications for extension of stay was unlawful, void, and of no effect and the defendant was bound to consider such applications on their merit and in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The court of appeal held that they had no legitimate expectation of extension and therefore no right to hearing, though revocation of their permits within the earlier granted period of permit would have been contrary to legitimate expectation. The legitimate expectation referred to in, this case did not give the alien students an enforceable right to stay for the time originally permitted but an enforceable right to be heard before the decision to revoke his permit was taken: a procedural protection only4. Evolution in India As already stated that the Doctrine of "Legitimate Expectation " is not a legal right in itself embedded in some statute of Code readily available for its inference and applicability. However it is a right to be treated fairly and the same has been fashioned by judicial precedents of various courts over a period time and is still in its evolving stage. The Supreme Court in M/S Sethi Auto Service Station vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors5. has examined the concept of 'legitimate expectation'. While dealing with the question of allotment of a plot by the DDA, the Supreme Court has enumerated various decisions of the concept of Legitimate Expectation and examined the law relating thereto. The Court held as under; "19. The protection of legitimate expectations, as pointed out in De Smith's Judicial Review (Sixth Edition) (para 12-001), is at the root of the constitutional principle of the rule of law, which requires regularity, predictability, and certainty in government's dealings with the public. The doctrine of legitimate expectation and its impact in the administrative law has been considered by this Court in a catena of decisions but for the sake of brevity we do not propose to refer to all these cases. Nevertheless, in order to appreciate the concept, we shall refer to a few decisions. At this juncture, we deem it necessary to refer to a decision by the House of Lords in Council of Civil Service Unions & Ors. Vs. Minister for the Civil Service, a locus classicus on the subject, wherein for the first time an attempt was made to give a comprehensive definition to the principle of legitimate expectation. Enunciating the basic principles relating to legitimate expectation, Lord Diplock observed that for a legitimate expectation to arise, the decision of the administrative authority must affect such person either (a) by altering rights or obligations of that person which are enforceable by or against him in private law or; (b) by depriving him of some benefit or advantage which either: (i) he has in the past been permitted by the decision maker to enjoy and which he can legitimately expect to be permitted to continue to do until some rational ground for withdrawing it has been communicated to him and he has been given an opportunity to comment thereon or (ii) he has received assurance from the decisionmaker that they will not be withdrawn without first giving him an opportunity of advancing reasons for contending that they should be withdrawn. 20. In Attorney General of Hong Kong Vs. Ng Yuen Shiu, a leading case on the subject, Lord Fraser said: "when a public authority has promised to follow a certain procedure, it is in the interest of good administration that it should act fairly and should implement its promise, so long as the implementation does not interfere with in its statutory duty". 21. Explaining the nature and scope of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in Food Corporation of India Vs. M/s Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, a three-Judge Bench of this Court had observed thus: "The mere reasonable or legitimate expectation of a citizen, in such a situation, may not by itself be a distinct enforceable right, but failure to consider and give due weight to it may render the decision arbitrary, and this is how the requirement of due consideration of a legitimate expectation forms part of the principle of non-arbitrariness, a necessary concomitant of the rule of law. Every legitimate expectation is a relevant factor requiring due consideration in a fair decision-making process. Whether the expectation of the claimant is reasonable or legitimate in the context is a question of fact in each case. Whenever the question arises, it is to be determined not according to the claimant's perception but in larger public interest wherein other more important considerations may outweigh what would otherwise have been the legitimate expectation of the claimant. A bona fide decision of the public authority reached in this manner would satisfy the requirement of nonarbitrariness and withstand judicial scrutiny. The doctrine of legitimate expectation gets assimilated in the rule of law and operates in our legal system in this manner and to this extent." 22. The concept of legitimate expectation again came up for consideration in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Hindustan Development Corporation & Ors. Referring to a large number of foreign and Indian decisions, including in Council of Civil Service Unions and Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries (supra) and elaborately explaining the concept of legitimate expectation, it was observed as under: "If a denial of legitimate expectation in a given case amounts to denial of right guaranteed or is arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair or biased, gross abuse of power or violation of principles of natural justice, the same can be questioned on the well-known grounds attracting Article 14 but a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It can be one of the grounds to consider but the court must lift the veil and see whether the decision is violative of these principles warranting interference. It depends very much on the facts and the recognized general principles of administrative law applicable to such facts and the concept of legitimate expectation which is the latest recruit to a long list of concepts fashioned by the courts for the review of administrative action, must be restricted to the general legal limitations applicable and binding the manner of the future exercise of administrative power in a particular case. It follows that the concept of legitimate expectation is "not the key which unlocks the treasury of natural justice and it ought not unlock the gate which shuts the court out of review on the merits", particularly when the element of speculation and uncertainty is inherent in that very concept." 23. Taking note of the observations of the Australian High Court in Attorney General for New South Wales Vs. Quinn that, "to strike down the exercise of administrative power solely on the ground of avoiding the disappointment of the legitimate expectations of an individual would be to set the Courts adrift on a featureless sea of pragmatism", speaking for the Bench, K. Jayachandra Reddy, J. said that there are stronger reasons as to why the legitimate expectation should not be substantively protected than the reasons as to why it should be protected. The caution sounded in the said Australian case that the Courts should restrain themselves and restrict such claims duly to the legal limitations was also endorsed. 24. Then again in National Buildings Construction Corporation Vs. S. Raghunathan & Ors., a three-Judge Bench of this Court observed as under: "The doctrine of "legitimate expectation" has its genesis in the field of administrative law. The Government and its departments, in administering the affairs of the country, are expected to honour their statements of policy or intention and treat the citizens with full personal consideration without any iota of abuse of discretion. The policy statements cannot be disregarded unfairly or applied selectively. Unfairness in the form of unreasonableness is akin to violation of natural justice. It was in this context that the doctrine of "legitimate expectation" was evolved which today has become a source of substantive as well as procedural rights. But claims based on "legitimate expectation" have been held to require reliance on representations and resulting detriment to the claimant in the same way as claims based on promissory estoppel." 25. This Court in Punjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors., referring to a large number of authorities on the question, observed that a change in policy can defeat a substantive legitimate expectation if it can be justified on "Wednesbury" reasonableness. The decision maker has the choice in the balancing of the pros and cons relevant to the change in policy. Therefore, the choice of the policy is for the decision maker and not for the Court. The legitimate substantive expectation, merely permits the Court to find out if the change in policy which is the cause for defeating the legitimate expectation is irrational or perverse or one which no reasonable person could have made. (Also see: Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer & Ors. 26. Very recently in Jitendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. It has been reiterated that a legitimate expectation is not the same thing as anticipation. It is distinct and different from a desire and hope. It is based on a right. It is grounded in the rule of law as requiring regularity, predictability and certainty in the Government's dealings with the public and the doctrine of legitimate expectation operates both in procedural and substantive matters. An examination of the afore-noted few decisions shows that the golden thread running through all these decisions is that a case for applicability of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, now accepted in the subjective sense as part of our legal jurisprudence, arises when an administrative body by reason of a representation or by past practice or conduct aroused an expectation which it would be within its powers to fulfill unless some overriding public interest comes in the way. However, a person who bases his claim on the doctrine of legitimate expectation, in the first instance, has to satisfy that he has relied on the said representation and the denial of that expectation has worked to his detriment. The Court could interfere only if the decision taken by the authority was found to be arbitrary, unreasonable or in gross abuse of power or in violation of principles of natural justice and not taken in public interest. But a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give a right to invoke these principles. It is well settled that the concept of legitimate expectation has no role to play where the State action is as a public policy or in the public interest unless the action taken amounts to an abuse of power. The court must not usurp the discretion of the public authority which is empowered to take the decisions under law and the court is expected to apply an objective standard which leaves to the deciding authority the full range of choice which the legislature is presumed to have intended. Even in a case where the decision is left entirely to the discretion of the deciding authority without any such legal bounds and if the decision is taken fairly and objectively, the court will not interfere on the ground of procedural fairness to a person whose interest based on legitimate expectation might be affected. Therefore, a legitimate expectation can at the most be one of the grounds which may give rise to judicial review but the granting of relief is very much limited. - @whatislegitimateexpectationobv

2,196 followers

June Quinn - @konstantinw0ig - Pinterest

June Quinn - @konstantinw0ig

0 followers

June Quinn - @unicornjune1997 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @unicornjune1997

0 followers

June Quinn - @juniperlove97 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @juniperlove97

0 followers

June Quinn - @junequinn8552 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @junequinn8552

0 followers

June Quinn - @jmquinn0546 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @jmquinn0546

0 followers

june quinn - @junequinn550 - Pinterest

june quinn - @junequinn550

0 followers

June Quinn - @juneq49 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @juneq49

0 followers

june quinn - @jquinn5983 - Pinterest

june quinn - @jquinn5983

13 followers

June. Quinn - @junequinn12 - Pinterest

June. Quinn - @junequinn12

1 follower

june quinn - @juq7 - Pinterest

june quinn - @juq7

0 followers

June Quinn - @junequinn1935 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @junequinn1935

0 followers

june quinn - @junebugjune97 - Pinterest

june quinn - @junebugjune97

0 followers

june quinn - @junebug3745 - Pinterest

june quinn - @junebug3745

0 followers

june quinn - @junequinn62 - Pinterest

june quinn - @junequinn62

0 followers

june quinn - @jquinn0031 - Pinterest

june quinn - @jquinn0031

0 followers

June Quinn - @meya123ao - Pinterest

June Quinn - @meya123ao

0 followers

June Quinn - @junequinn1948virginmediacom - Pinterest

June Quinn - @junequinn1948virginmediacom

0 followers

June Szentkuti-quinn - @szentkutiquinn - Pinterest

June Szentkuti-quinn - @szentkutiquinn

0 followers

June Quinn - @juneandfrank - Pinterest

June Quinn - @juneandfrank

0 followers

june quinn - @junequinn7 - Pinterest

june quinn - @junequinn7

0 followers

Mary-june Quinn - @maryjunequinn - Pinterest

Mary-june Quinn - @maryjunequinn

0 followers

June Quinn - @alexanderquinn1997 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @alexanderquinn1997

1 follower

June Quinn - @aquamarine1997 - Pinterest

June Quinn - @aquamarine1997

0 followers

Jessica Silvey - @junequinn - Pinterest

Jessica Silvey - @junequinn

560 followers

Junequinn - @junequinn160 - Pinterest

Junequinn - @junequinn160

0 followers

junequinn - @junequinn1948 - Pinterest

junequinn - @junequinn1948

0 followers

Junequinn - @junequinn9365 - Pinterest

Junequinn - @junequinn9365

0 followers

Junequinn - @junequinn1932 - Pinterest

Junequinn - @junequinn1932

0 followers

Quinn June Medina - @medinaquinnjune - Pinterest

Quinn June Medina - @medinaquinnjune

0 followers

Quinn June - @quinnjune - Pinterest

Quinn June - @quinnjune

0 followers

Show all results...
Megan June Quinn - Quora

Megan June Quinn

Studied at Xaverian College
26 followers

June Quinn Kyger - Quora

June Quinn Kyger

22 followers

June Quinn - Quora

June Quinn

Works at Burger King
6 followers

June Quinn - Quora

June Quinn

4 followers

June Quinn - Quora

June Quinn

June Quinn - Quora

June Quinn

June Quinn - Quora

June Quinn

June Quinn - Quora

June Quinn

June Quinn - Quora

June Quinn

June Quinn - Quora

June Quinn

Show all results...
1974 Willowbrook High School Yearbook - Archives

1974 Willowbrook High School Yearbook

Willowbrook High School
1974

1973 Willowbrook High School Yearbook - Archives

1973 Willowbrook High School Yearbook

Willowbrook High School
1973

The Black Swan [1964] - Archives

The Black Swan [1964]

Charles D. Owen High School (Swannanoa, N.C.)
1964

[Yearbook] - Archives

[Yearbook]

The Black Swan [1963] - Archives

The Black Swan [1963]

Charles D. Owen High School (Swannanoa, N.C.)
1963

The Black Swan [1962] - Archives

The Black Swan [1962]

Charles D. Owen High School (Swannanoa, N.C.)
1962

The Buccaneer - Archives

The Buccaneer

East Carolina University
1953

1953 Union High School Yearbook - Archives

1953 Union High School Yearbook

Union High School
1953

The Black Swan [1965] - Archives

The Black Swan [1965]

Charles D. Owen High School (Swannanoa, N.C.)
1965

1965 Lee High School Yearbook - Archives

1965 Lee High School Yearbook

Lee High School
1965

1981 Pinkston High School Yearbook - Archives

1981 Pinkston High School Yearbook

Pinkston High School
1981

Islander - Archives

Islander

Poquoson High School
1972

Blue Jacket - Archives

Blue Jacket

Shawnee Junior High School (Fort Wayne, Ind.)
1972

Dental Digest 1959: Vol 65 Index - Archives

Dental Digest 1959: Vol 65 Index

1959

Sodbusters: A history of Kinuso and Swan River Settlement - Archives

Sodbusters: A history of Kinuso and Swan River Settlement

Quinn, Jean
1979

Arrow - Archives

Arrow

Woodlan Junior/Senior High School (Woodburn, Ohio),Woodburn High School (Woodburn, Ohio)?UNAUTHORIZED
1959

Leonard F. Meares’ 73 Big Jim western novels as example of changing names and coordinated publishing - Archives

Leonard F. Meares’ 73 Big Jim western novels as example of changing names and coordinated publishing

Anders N. Nilsson
2025

Agawam Advertiser News. 1998. - Archives

Agawam Advertiser News. 1998.

Agawam (Mass. : Town)
1998

Bethel Oxford County Citizen, September 13, 1956 - Archives

Bethel Oxford County Citizen, September 13, 1956

Bethel Oxford County Citizen
1956

White Columns - Archives

White Columns

Augusta College
1991

Show all results...

Obituary for June Quinn Sullivan (Guest book)

June Quinn Sullivan, 66, of 4526 Pond Road, Burlington died at UNC Hospitals at Chapel Hill on Thursday, August 29, 2013. A memorial service will be held at ...

Mary-June Quinn - Women's Tennis - Angelo State University Athletics

Mary-June Quinn - 2024-2025: Quinn is currently 3-1 in singles play and 4-4 in doubles play. Personal: Daughter of Naree and Michael.

June Quinn Obituary June 19, 2021 - T.M. Ralph Funeral Homes

July 3, 1926 — June 19, 2021. June Quinn, age 94, a longtime resident of Plantation, passed away peacefully at her home on January 19, 2021, ...

Search June Quinn Obituaries and Funeral Services - Legacy.com

Legacy's online obit database has obituaries, death notices, and funeral services for 20 people named June Quinn from thousands of the largest funeral homes ...

June QUINN personal appointments - Companies House - GOV.UK

June QUINN. Filter appointments. Filter appointments. Current appointments. Total number of appointments 1. Date of birth: June 1933. IMPRINT PUBLISHING LIMITED ...

Christina June Quinn - IMDb

Christina June Quinn. Additional Crew: Unnatural. Christina June Quinn is known for Unnatural (2024).

Obituary: June Quinn - The Guardian

My wife, June Quinn, who has died aged 69, had 15 minutes of fame in November 1980, when the court of appeal ruled that Williams Furniture ...

June Quinn Obituary November 15, 2012

June Quinn. October 8, 1927 — November 15, 2012. Madison -June A. Quinn, age 85, passed away of bile duct cancer on Thursday, November 15, 2012 at Agrace ...

June QUINN Obituary - Death Notice and Service Information

June QUINN passed away. The obituary was featured in Cumbernauld News on May 2, 2018. View their obituary at Legacy.com.

Contributions to the tribute of Marion June Quinn | Windsor Chapel ...

Click here to send a condolence to the family of Marion June Quinn, or to share a memory. ... I was shocked an greatly saddened by news of Mary's passing. Over ...

Mary-June Quinn Tennis Player Profile | ITF

Mary-June Quinn (18) is a tennis player from Australia. Click here for a full player profile.

Obituary | Dorothy June Quinn-Smith | Herbert Funeral Home, PC

Dorothy June Quinn-Smith. March 10, 1930 - February 25, 2016. Send Sympathy Flowers. Flower orders are fulfilled and hand delivered by our trusted in-town ...

Player Activity - Mary-June Quinn - Tennis Recruiting

Mary-June Quinn. International - Australia. Graduate, Class of 2024. Overview | Her Activity | Analytics | History | Update. Overall Record: 1-2 ...

June Quinn - The Dispatch

June Quinn. Posted: July 18, 2014. COLUMBUS — June Kathryn Van Tuyl Quinn, 90, died July 17, 2014, at Collegeview Personal Care Home.

Obituary of June Quinn | Day & Carter Mortuary

Obituary of June Quinn. Bedford- June (Mills) Quinn, 87, died Sunday at Stonebridge Health Campus in Bedford. June was born June 12, ...

Obituary information for Angela June Quinn

View Angela June Quinn's obituary, contribute to their memorial, see their funeral service details, and more.

Obituary | June Quinn | Hamilton Funeral Home & Cremation Services

View The Obituary For June Quinn. Please join us in Loving, Sharing and Memorializing June Quinn on this permanent online memorial.

Obituary for June Wood Quinn

June Quinn Obituary. HARDWICK-June Wood Quinn, 88, of Hardwick passed away on Wednesday, February 17, 2021 after a long struggle with ...

June Quinn Obituary | The Virginian-Pilot

June Quinn CHESAPEAKE - June Quinn, nee Philp, passed away suddenly July 7, 2011, while visiting family in Wellington, New Ze.

Robin June Quinn Obituary - Spokane, WA - Dignity Memorial

Robin June Quinn was born on March 5, 1958 and passed away on December 25, 2017 in Spokane, WA and is under the care of Advantage Funeral & Cremation ...

Betty June Quinn - Obituary - Braman Mortuary & Cremation Services

View The Obituary For Betty June Quinn. Please join us in Loving, Sharing and Memorializing Betty June Quinn on this permanent online memorial.

Christina June Quinn v. Scott Allen Diehl - Justia Law

Christina June Quinn v. Scott Allen Diehl. Annotate this Case. Court Description: Authoring Judge: Judge Andy D. Bennett. Download PDF. Thumbnails

June Quinn Saunders Obituary May 14, 2017

June Quinn Saunders, 91, of Zanesville, died at 5:30 P.M. on Sunday, May 14, 2017, at The Oaks at North Pointe, Zanesville.

Contributions to the tribute of June Quinn | Day & Carter Mortuary

Click here to send a condolence to the family of June Quinn, or to share a memory. ... I will always remember June!!! She always had a pleasant word and smile ...

Show all results...

Search people online

Related searches:
Joseph Quinn
Joseph Quinn
Kathleen Simpson
Kathleen Simpson
Kevin Quinn
Kevin Quinn
Lauren Scheffler
Lauren Scheffler
Show more...

People Search:

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Continue
We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. More info